From: Felipe Franciosi <felipe.franciosi@citrix.com>
To: "'Vitaly Kuznetsov'" <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"jerry.snitselaar@oracle.com" <jerry.snitselaar@oracle.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"Roger Pau Monne" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Backport request to stable of two performance related fixes for xen-blkfront (3.13 fixes to earlier trees)
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:59:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9F2C4E7DFB7839489C89757A66C5AD625AC66D@AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lhtwznhl.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 2192 bytes --]
I had a small side-bar thread with Vitaly discussing the comprehensiveness of his measurements and how his tests are being conducted. He will report new results as they become available.
In the meantime, I stand behind that the patches need to be backported and there is a regression if we don't do that.
Ubuntu has already provided a test kernel with the patches pulled in. I will test those as soon as I get the chance (hopefully by the end of the week).
See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1319003
Felipe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@redhat.com]
> Sent: 20 May 2014 12:41
> To: Roger Pau Monne
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; axboe@kernel.dk; Felipe Franciosi;
> gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> stable@vger.kernel.org; jerry.snitselaar@oracle.com; xen-
> devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Backport request to stable of two performance
> related fixes for xen-blkfront (3.13 fixes to earlier trees)
>
> Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> writes:
>
> > On 20/05/14 11:54, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> 1) ramdisks (/dev/ram*) (persistent grants and indirect descriptors
> >>> disabled)
> >>
> >> sorry, there was a typo. persistent grants and indirect descriptors
> >> are enabled with ramdisks, otherwise such testing won't make any sense.
> >
> > I'm not sure how is that possible, from your description I get that
> > you are using 3.11 on the Dom0, which means blkback has support for
> > persistent grants and indirect descriptors, but the guest is RHEL7,
> > that's using the 3.10 kernel AFAICT, and this kernel only has
> > persistent grants implemented.
>
> RHEL7 kernel is mostly merged with 3.11 in its Xen part, we have indirect
> descriptors backported.
>
> Actually I tried my tests with upstream (Fedora) kernel and results were
> similar. I can try comparing e.g. 3.11.10 with 3.12.0 and provide exact
> measurements.
>
> --
> Vitaly
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-20 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-14 19:11 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-05-14 19:21 ` Josh Boyer
2014-05-20 3:19 ` Greg KH
2014-05-22 12:54 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-20 9:32 ` [Xen-devel] " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-05-20 9:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-05-20 10:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-20 11:41 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-05-20 13:59 ` Felipe Franciosi [this message]
2014-05-22 8:52 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-06-04 5:48 ` Greg KH
2014-06-06 10:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2014-06-06 10:58 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-06-10 13:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-06-10 16:55 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-06-12 12:00 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-06-12 12:32 ` Felipe Franciosi
2014-06-12 15:32 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-06-20 17:06 ` Felipe Franciosi
2014-06-10 17:26 ` Felipe Franciosi
2014-06-06 13:56 ` Greg KH
2014-06-06 14:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-06 14:03 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9F2C4E7DFB7839489C89757A66C5AD625AC66D@AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net \
--to=felipe.franciosi@citrix.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jerry.snitselaar@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®