Re: [PATCH 1088/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

[Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>]

Hi Baole,

> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> index eb4f5f2..1dfb4bc 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> @@ -7636,5 +7636,5 @@ void l2cap_exit(void)
> 	l2cap_cleanup_sockets();
> }
> 
> -module_param(disable_ertm, bool, 0644);
> +module_param(disable_ertm, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_ertm, "Disable enhanced retransmission mode");

I am not taking any of these patches for the Bluetooth subsystem or its drivers. They are pretty much pointless to me and do not improve readability. I think they actually decrease readability. Every Unix/Linux developers knowns what 0644 (and all its magic cousins) mean.

The only way I would accept any patches to change this is if they would introduce module_param_rw / module_param_ro or something alike. Since I am pretty sure the majority is 644 and 444 here anyway.

Regards

Marcel