Re: [PATCH v1] memory: tegra: Check whether reset is already asserted

[Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>]

23.01.2021 02:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski пишет:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 12:58:12AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 23.01.2021 00:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski пишет:
>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:52:10AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> Check whether memory client reset is already asserted in order to prevent
>>>> DMA-flush error on trying to re-assert an already asserted reset.
>>>>
>>>> This becomes a problem once PMC GENPD is enabled to use memory resets
>>>> since GENPD will get a error and fail to toggle power domain. PMC GENPDs
>>>> can't be toggled safely without holding memory reset on Tegra and we're
>>>> about to fix this.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
>>>> Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> # A500 T20 and Nexus7 T30
>>>
>>> Don't add your own Tested-by. Author has to test it.  However this is a
>>> v1 and already three other people added tests. Where are the emails?
>>
>> The test results were given on #tegra irc.
>>
>> Author doesn't have to test, from time to time I'm helping people who
>> can't make a patch with fixing obvious bugs for the h/w that I don't
>> have access to.
> 
> By default, author's patches are assumed to be tested, otherwise we
> would be putting own Tested-by in most of the cases (ideally: in all).
> Just because you do not see author's Tested-by everywhere it does not
> mean that author did not test it...
> 
> Testing is also a requirement:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst#L35
> 
> Therefore if your non-trivial patches are not tested, please also
> mention it with RFT or after '---'.
> 
>>
>> Anyways, I'll make v2 with myself removed if you prefer that, thanks.
> 
> I applied it without your tested-by. If the tested platform is anyhow
> relevant, just mention it in the commit msg.

Alright, thank you. In this particular case the platform should be
irrelevant.