From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
lizefan@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
guro@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] blkcg: account requests instead of bios for request based request_queues
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:19:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a2ddc6a-d618-a896-290c-254ffeb5e9d6@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171114232355.vjxlzfbqbqj5ihq4@kernel.org>
On 11/14/2017 04:23 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 02:26:12PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> blkcg accounting is currently bio based, which is silly for request
>> based request_queues. This is silly as the number of bios doesn't
>> have much to do with the actual number of IOs issued to the underlying
>> device (can be significantly higher or lower) and may change depending
>> on the implementation details on how the bios are issued (e.g. from
>> the recent split-bios-while-issuing change).
>>
>> request based request_queues have QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT set by default
>> which controls the gendisk accounting. Do cgroup accounting for those
>> request_queues together with gendisk accounting on request completion.
>>
>> This makes cgroup accounting consistent with gendisk accounting and
>> what's happening on the system.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> block/blk-core.c | 3 +++
>> include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index 048be4a..ad23b96 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -2429,6 +2429,7 @@ void blk_account_io_completion(struct request *req, unsigned int bytes)
>> cpu = part_stat_lock();
>> part = req->part;
>> part_stat_add(cpu, part, sectors[rw], bytes >> 9);
>> + blkcg_account_io_completion(req, bytes);
>> part_stat_unlock();
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -2454,6 +2455,8 @@ void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req)
>> part_round_stats(req->q, cpu, part);
>> part_dec_in_flight(req->q, part, rw);
>>
>> + blkcg_account_io_done(req);
>> +
>> hd_struct_put(part);
>> part_stat_unlock();
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h b/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
>> index 96eed0f..f2f9691 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
>> @@ -715,7 +715,8 @@ static inline bool blkcg_bio_issue_check(struct request_queue *q,
>>
>> throtl = blk_throtl_bio(q, blkg, bio);
>>
>> - if (!throtl) {
>> + /* if @q does io stat, blkcg stats are updated together with them */
>> + if (!blk_queue_io_stat(q) && !throtl) {
>
> Reviewed-by: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
>
> One nitpick, can we use q->request_fn to determine request based queue? I think
> that is more reliable and usual way for this.
That won't work for mq - but there is a helper for this, queue_is_rq_based().
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-15 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-12 22:26 [PATCHSET] blkcg: basic accounting and throttling fixes Tejun Heo
2017-11-12 22:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] blkcg: relocate __blkg_release_rcu() Tejun Heo
2017-11-14 23:12 ` Shaohua Li
2017-11-12 22:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] blkcg: use percpu_ref for blkcg_gq->refcnt Tejun Heo
2017-11-14 23:12 ` Shaohua Li
2017-11-12 22:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] blkcg: associate a request with its blkcg_gq instead of request_list Tejun Heo
2017-11-13 20:15 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2017-11-14 23:17 ` Shaohua Li
2017-11-15 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2017-11-12 22:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] blkcg: refactor blkcg_gq lookup and creation in blkcg_bio_issue_check() Tejun Heo
2017-11-14 23:18 ` Shaohua Li
2017-11-12 22:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] blkcg: associate blk-mq requests with the matching blkcg_gqs Tejun Heo
2017-11-12 22:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] blkcg: account requests instead of bios for request based request_queues Tejun Heo
2017-11-14 23:23 ` Shaohua Li
2017-11-15 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2017-11-15 17:19 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-11-15 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 " Tejun Heo
2017-11-12 22:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] blk-throtl: don't throttle the same IO multiple times Tejun Heo
2017-11-13 4:07 ` Shaohua Li
2017-11-13 11:13 ` Tejun Heo
2017-11-13 15:57 ` Tejun Heo
2017-11-13 19:54 ` Shaohua Li
2017-11-13 19:58 ` Tejun Heo
2017-11-13 19:58 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a2ddc6a-d618-a896-290c-254ffeb5e9d6@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome