From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] iommu: __iommu_attach_group: check for non-NULL blocking_domain
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 10:23:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a3ebe9b-518e-49ef-b87d-925d951a446f@kernel.org> (raw)
Loading the omap3isp driver fails in __iommu_attach_group:
group->blocking_domain is NULL, and so the check
group->domain != group->blocking_domain is always true and it
returns -EBUSY.
Only return -EBUSY if group->blocking_domain is non-NULL.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>
Fixes: 0286300e6045 ("iommu: iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() must always assign a domain")
---
Since I am unfamiliar with the iommu core code, I am uncertain whether I am
just papering over a bug elsewhere, or whether this is really the correct solution.
The omap3isp code in question is here:
drivers/media/platform/ti/omap3isp/isp.c, function isp_attach_iommu().
This omap3isp code predates the addition of blocking_domain and it used to work
before that feature was added.
I've tested this patch with my Beagle XM board.
If this patch is addressing the issue in the wrong place, then advise
on what the correct solution is would be very much appreciated!
I have a bunch of media omap3isp cleanup patches pending, but there is no point in
posting those until this issue is resolved.
Regards,
Hans
---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 060ebe330ee1..0ab1671ee850 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -2220,7 +2220,7 @@ static int __iommu_attach_group(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev;
if (group->domain && group->domain != group->default_domain &&
- group->domain != group->blocking_domain)
+ group->blocking_domain && group->domain != group->blocking_domain)
return -EBUSY;
dev = iommu_group_first_dev(group);
--
2.47.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-29 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-29 8:23 Hans Verkuil [this message]
2025-09-29 12:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-29 12:18 ` Hans Verkuil
2025-09-29 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-29 13:30 ` Hans Verkuil
2025-09-29 13:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-30 10:28 ` Robin Murphy
2025-10-01 6:03 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-10-01 15:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-07 9:38 ` Hans Verkuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a3ebe9b-518e-49ef-b87d-925d951a446f@kernel.org \
--to=hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®