From: liuderong <liuderong2022@gmail.com>
To: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
liuderong@xiaomi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix race between inline dir conversion and folio read
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:37:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a542b7e-bbb0-4c14-8760-f3aceaab39e2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918025416.604297-1-dhavale@google.com>
On 9/18/2026 10:54 AM, Sandeep Dhavale wrote:
> Commit 90f097b1403f ("ext4: refactor the inline directory conversion and
> new directory codepaths") moved directory block initialization in
> ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock() into ext4_init_dirblock(), unlocking
> data_bh before setting BH_Uptodate.
>
> When block size is smaller than PAGE_SIZE, multiple buffer heads share a
> single block device folio. If a concurrent read on that folio runs via
> block_read_full_folio() while data_bh is unlocked and not uptodate, it
> locks data_bh and submits a disk read for the uninitialized block.
>
> Because ext4_init_dirblock() initializes bh->b_data without holding the
> buffer lock, the disk read races with and overwrites the initialized
> directory entries and checksum tail, corrupting the directory block:
>
> EXT4-fs warning: ext4_dirblock_csum_verify:375: inode #...:
> No space for directory leaf checksum. Please run e2fsck -D.
> EXT4-fs error: __ext4_find_entry:1626: inode #...:
> checksumming directory block 0
>
> To fix this, mark data_bh uptodate before unlocking it in
> ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock(), just like the regular file path
> does. Additionally, hold lock_buffer(bh) in ext4_init_dirblock() while
> populating the directory entries and checksum tail so any buffer
> modifications are properly serialized.
>
> Fixes: 90f097b1403f ("ext4: refactor the inline directory conversion and new directory codepaths")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flash
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>
> ---
> Note:
> This issue was reported by an Android partner encountering kernel panics
> in ext4_dirblock_csum_verify() ("No space for directory leaf checksum")
> on 16KB page size kernels mounting a 4KB block size ext4 filesystem.
>
> We verified with a standalone reproducer that the race reproduces
> deterministically on Iteration 0 (< 1s) on both ARM64 (16KB page size,
> 4KB ext4 blocks) and upstream ext4-tree/dev on x86_64 (4KB page size,
> 1KB ext4 blocks), and confirmed that this patch resolves the issue.
I verified this patch on an MTK platform running Android 17 (kernel
6.18) with 16KB page size and 4KB ext4 block size: the script can
reliably reproduce the issue. After applying the patch, the issue no
longer reproduces.
Reproduction log snippet:
EXT4-fs warning (device loop54): ext4_dirblock_csum_verify:375: inode
#15: comm repro_issue2: No space for directory leaf checksum. Please run
e2fsck -D.
EXT4-fs error (device loop54): __ext4_find_entry:1626: inode #15: comm
repro_issue2: checksumming directory block 0
Tested-by: liuderong <liuderong@xiaomi.com>
> fs/ext4/inline.c | 1 +
> fs/ext4/namei.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> index ceee69a66482..0aa14cee3310 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> @@ -1167,6 +1167,7 @@ static int ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock(handle_t *handle,
> error = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle,
> inode, data_bh);
> } else {
> + set_buffer_uptodate(data_bh);
> unlock_buffer(data_bh);
> inode->i_size = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
> i_size_write(inode, inode->i_sb->s_blocksize);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> index 3b9740c1c16d..6550102fb56b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> @@ -2933,6 +2933,7 @@ int ext4_init_dirblock(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> if (ext4_has_feature_metadata_csum(inode->i_sb))
> csum_size = sizeof(struct ext4_dir_entry_tail);
>
> + lock_buffer(bh);
> de->inode = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_ino);
> de->name_len = 1;
> de->rec_len = ext4_rec_len_to_disk(ext4_dir_rec_len(de->name_len, NULL),
> @@ -2965,6 +2966,7 @@ int ext4_init_dirblock(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> BUFFER_TRACE(dir_block, "call ext4_handle_dirty_metadata");
> set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> set_buffer_verified(bh);
> + unlock_buffer(bh);
> return ext4_handle_dirty_dirblock(handle, inode, bh);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 2:54 Sandeep Dhavale
2026-09-24 9:37 ` liuderong [this message]
2026-09-24 16:18 ` Jan Kara
2026-09-24 23:12 ` Sandeep Dhavale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a542b7e-bbb0-4c14-8760-f3aceaab39e2@gmail.com \
--to=liuderong2022@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=dhavale@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuderong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®