mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Nikola Prica <nikprica@amd.com>, bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jerry.jiang@amd.com, haijun.chang@amd.com, andy.zhang@amd.com,
	jim.chow@broadcom.com, matthew.mcclure@broadcom.com,
	Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@amd.com>,
	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Accept AtomicOps already enabled by the hypervisor
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 10:47:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a71c692-66e7-4c5a-b98a-69ebae2e5bb8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907161701.454364-1-nikprica@amd.com>

On 9/7/26 18:17, Nikola Prica wrote:
> From: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@amd.com>
> 
> pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() currently fails when no root port is
> visible. That is common in passthrough guests (ESXi, Hyper-V): the
> endpoint is assigned to the VM, but the guest topology has no root
> port above it.
> 
> In those setups the hypervisor may already have enabled AtomicOp
> requester enable on the device. If PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_ATOMIC_REQ is set,
> treat AtomicOps as already enabled and return success instead of
> failing the Root Port walk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

Bjorn first of all any objections to this? It sounds save to me, only a handful of drivers actually use this function and it generally seems to be the right things to do.

Then if you agree any objections to up-streaming it through AMDs GPU branch? That would make things a bit easier for us.

Thanks,
Christian.

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Be more strict and only apply logic in headless device case.
> 
>  drivers/pci/pci.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index b2879a6be5f8..62729ade496f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -3769,8 +3769,18 @@ int pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 cap_mask)
>  	}
>  
>  	root = pcie_find_root_port(dev);
> -	if (!root)
> +	if (!root) {
> +		/*
> +		 * A hypervisor may expose a headless topology with no
> +		 * visible root port.  If it has already set AtomicOp
> +		 * Requester Enable, there is nothing more to do.
> +		 */
> +		pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl2);
> +		if (ctl2 & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_ATOMIC_REQ)
> +			return 0;
> +
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
>  
>  	pcie_capability_read_dword(root, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap);
>  	if ((cap & cap_mask) != cap_mask)


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-08  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260903121217.23F751F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-09-07 16:17 ` Nikola Prica
2026-09-08  8:47   ` Christian König [this message]
2026-09-11 14:09     ` Prica, Nikola
2026-09-14 13:41   ` Gerd Bayer
2026-09-14 13:54     ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a71c692-66e7-4c5a-b98a-69ebae2e5bb8@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=andy.zhang@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=haijun.chang@amd.com \
    --cc=jerry.jiang@amd.com \
    --cc=jim.chow@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.mcclure@broadcom.com \
    --cc=nikola.prica@amd.com \
    --cc=nikprica@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®