mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>, <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	<cohuck@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@openeuler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: register debugfs for hisilicon migration driver
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 14:42:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a84fd20-720e-2bc0-7646-6c344befbecd@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y4oX4zC0eUbZsmMW@nvidia.com>

On 2022/12/2 23:21, Jason Gunthorpe Wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 05:26:23PM +0800, Longfang Liu wrote:
>> On the debugfs framework of VFIO, register the debug function
>> for the live migration driver of the hisilicon accelerator device.
>>
>> On the basis of the original public debug function, a private debug
>> function is added, so that the single-step debugging function
>> during live migration can be realized.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c    | 250 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.h    |   9 +
>>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_debugfs.c           |  10 +-
>>  3 files changed, 268 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>> index eb18edffbd5f..0f35cde6e8ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
>>  
>>  #include "hisi_acc_vfio_pci.h"
>> +#include "../vfio_pci_debugfs.h"
>>  
>>  /* Return 0 on VM acc device ready, -ETIMEDOUT hardware timeout */
>>  static int qm_wait_dev_not_ready(struct hisi_qm *qm)
>> @@ -609,6 +610,18 @@ hisi_acc_check_int_state(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void hisi_acc_vf_migf_save(struct hisi_acc_vf_migration_file *src_migf,
>> +	struct hisi_acc_vf_migration_file *dst_migf)
>> +{
>> +	if (!dst_migf)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	dst_migf->disabled = false;
>> +	dst_migf->total_length = src_migf->total_length;
>> +	memcpy(&dst_migf->vf_data, &src_migf->vf_data,
>> +		    sizeof(struct acc_vf_data));
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void hisi_acc_vf_disable_fd(struct hisi_acc_vf_migration_file *migf)
>>  {
>>  	mutex_lock(&migf->lock);
>> @@ -621,12 +634,16 @@ static void hisi_acc_vf_disable_fd(struct hisi_acc_vf_migration_file *migf)
>>  static void hisi_acc_vf_disable_fds(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev)
>>  {
>>  	if (hisi_acc_vdev->resuming_migf) {
>> +		hisi_acc_vf_migf_save(hisi_acc_vdev->resuming_migf,
>> +						hisi_acc_vdev->debug_migf);
>>  		hisi_acc_vf_disable_fd(hisi_acc_vdev->resuming_migf);
>>  		fput(hisi_acc_vdev->resuming_migf->filp);
>>  		hisi_acc_vdev->resuming_migf = NULL;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	if (hisi_acc_vdev->saving_migf) {
>> +		hisi_acc_vf_migf_save(hisi_acc_vdev->saving_migf,
>> +						hisi_acc_vdev->debug_migf);
>>  		hisi_acc_vf_disable_fd(hisi_acc_vdev->saving_migf);
>>  		fput(hisi_acc_vdev->saving_migf->filp);
>>  		hisi_acc_vdev->saving_migf = NULL;
>> @@ -1188,6 +1205,231 @@ static long hisi_acc_vfio_pci_ioctl(struct vfio_device *core_vdev, unsigned int
>>  	return vfio_pci_core_ioctl(core_vdev, cmd, arg);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int hisi_acc_vf_debug_io(struct vfio_device *vdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev = hisi_acc_get_vf_dev(vdev);
>> +	struct hisi_qm *vf_qm = &hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm;
>> +	struct device *dev = vdev->dev;
>> +	u64 data;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	data = readl(vf_qm->io_base + QM_MB_CMD_SEND_BASE);
>> +	dev_info(dev, "debug mailbox val: 0x%llx\n", data);
>> +
>> +	ret = qm_wait_dev_not_ready(vf_qm);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		dev_err(dev, "VF device not ready!\n");
> 
> debugfs has helpers for this, you should use debugfs_print_regs32()
> 

I analyzed it, and there is no need to replace it here, because it is
a subtype of the "debug" file operation, not an independent debugfs
file operation.

Thanks,
Longfang.

>> +static int hisi_acc_vf_debug_resume(struct vfio_device *vdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev = hisi_acc_get_vf_dev(vdev);
>> +	struct hisi_acc_vf_migration_file *migf = hisi_acc_vdev->debug_migf;
>> +	struct device *dev = vdev->dev;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = vf_qm_state_save(hisi_acc_vdev, migf);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to save device data!\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = vf_qm_check_match(hisi_acc_vdev, migf);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to match the VF!\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = vf_qm_load_data(hisi_acc_vdev, migf);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to recover the VF!\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	vf_qm_fun_reset(&hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm);
>> +	dev_info(dev, "successful to resume device data!\n");
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> This doesn't seem like it belongs in debugfs at all, please just write
> a test progam using normal vfio ioctls to do these steps and put in
> the kernel selftests directory.
> 
>> +static int hisi_acc_vf_debug_save(struct vfio_device *vdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev = hisi_acc_get_vf_dev(vdev);
>> +	struct hisi_acc_vf_migration_file *migf = hisi_acc_vdev->debug_migf;
>> +	struct device *dev = vdev->dev;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = vf_qm_state_save(hisi_acc_vdev, migf);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to save device data!\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +	dev_info(dev, "successful to save device data!\n");
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> Ditto, I don't think debugfs should be accessing the device state
> independently of the main FSM.
> 
> Jason
> .
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-17  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-02  9:26 [PATCH v4 0/5] add debugfs to " Longfang Liu
2022-12-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] vfio/migration: Add debugfs to live " Longfang Liu
2022-12-02 10:02   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-12-05 13:42     ` liulongfang
2022-12-02 15:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-05 13:39     ` liulongfang
2022-12-05 13:55       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-08  8:40         ` liulongfang
2022-12-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: extract public functions for container_of Longfang Liu
2022-12-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: register debugfs for hisilicon migration driver Longfang Liu
2022-12-02 15:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-05 13:44     ` liulongfang
2022-12-09  8:41     ` liulongfang
2022-12-17  6:42     ` liulongfang [this message]
2022-12-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Documentation: add debugfs description for hisi_acc_vfio_pci Longfang Liu
2022-12-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] vfio: update live migration device status Longfang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a84fd20-720e-2bc0-7646-6c344befbecd@huawei.com \
    --to=liulongfang@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®