Re: [PATCH] Small kfree cleanup, save a local variable.

[Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>]

On 6/19/05, Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de> wrote:
> Quoting Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>:
> > Here's a patch with a small improvement to kernel/auditsc.c .
> > There's no need for the local variable  struct audit_entry *e  ,
> > we can just call kfree directly on container_of() .
> 
> Did you look at the assembly output? Does it change?
> I think the compiler optimizes this variable away, anyway.
> So, if there's no improvement, I would personally prefer the
> original form as it's more readable.
> 
gcc does optimize it away. 
Personally I find both forms equally readable, and with the change the
source matches what the code actually ends up as, but I don't care
much one way or the other.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html