From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: "Paul Fulghum" <paulkf@microgate.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: make -j with j <= 4 seems to only load a single CPU core
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:51:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a8748490602211351v29c7804ew3a1305326941ea84@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1140558161.9838.8.camel@amdx2.microgate.com>
On 2/21/06, Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 22:10 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > I should probably mention that the kernel I'm currently running and
> > observing this behaviour with is 2.6.16-rc4-mm1.
> ...
> > > I find this quite strange since anything from 'make -j 2' and up
> > > should be able to keep both cores resonably busy, but there seems to
> > > be a huge difference between j <= 4 and j > 4.
>
> I've seen the same thing (on Athlon 64x2 64 bit)
> but was not sure if it was a problem.
>
> The break point for me seems to be between -j 2 and -j 3
> -j 2 = serialized (or the appearance of)
> -j 3 = both cores mostly busy
>
> I'm pretty sure with an earlier 2.6 kernel source (but same environment)
> I did not see this. I'll start back tracking to earlier kernels
> to see if I can identify when this started.
>
I know positively that I've seen this with previous 2.6.16-<something>
kernels, but not sure which ones exactely. I just dismissed it as
something that would probably be fixed soon and then today when I
build a few test kernels I noticed it again and thought "ohh, so it
didn't get fixed, better report it".
I don't recall seeing it with 2.6.15 and earlier kernels, but I'm not
at all sure - especially since I only got this Athlon X2 box recently
and the first kernels I ever ran on it were 2.6.15-<something>.
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-21 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-21 21:02 Jesper Juhl
2006-02-21 21:10 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-21 21:42 ` Paul Fulghum
2006-02-21 21:47 ` Paul Fulghum
2006-02-21 21:51 ` Jesper Juhl [this message]
2006-02-21 21:54 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-21 21:59 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-21 22:02 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-21 22:15 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-02-21 22:18 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-23 19:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a8748490602211351v29c7804ew3a1305326941ea84@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulkf@microgate.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®