From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751172AbWDSWVm (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:21:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751283AbWDSWVm (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:21:42 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.196]:10266 "EHLO nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751172AbWDSWVl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:21:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=t6OKV3bqGgjWqsFBLcNm63+IUZ1l1z2ZQtOULB07rEo3JOoE9xaRa2LFtLABEdWb1MZHAL4rj46yiWeC7H4f7glY7ZjVakX0neZSY9grQSLkrrKe9iF9mXYlLcLAczbpHhRB80E+n8/om8y4oJ7I2wErMXZymJgg937DTiZIutk= Message-ID: <9a8748490604191521g7e4b49e8mcf01996d3b2c4e21@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:21:33 +0200 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Tilman Schmidt" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ISDN: unsafe interaction between isdn_write and isdn_writebuf_stub Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <44457350.4040802@imap.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <60xlD-5Y2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <62rF9-2nN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <44457350.4040802@imap.cc> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/19/06, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > On 17.04.2006 04:30, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > No replies to this patch (below) at all, despite lots of people and > > lists on CC :-( > > Ohh well, adding akpm to CC so that perhaps the patch can make it into > > -mm and at least get some testing. > > Yeah, apparently nobody wants to put much work into i4l anymore. So it would seem. > Everybody's waiting for it to be replaced by CAPI, only we don't quite > seem to be there yet. > I don't know the state of that, but as long as the i4l stuff is in the kernel I think we should try to fix bugs when we find them, so I'll just try to push the patch again in a while. > Anyway, my development machine has been running with your patch for a > while, with no apparent ill effects. Although this hardly qualifies as > exhaustive testing, it does seem do indicate that the patch is on the > right track. > Thanks a lot for trying the patch and your feedback, I really appreciate it. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html