From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751135AbWG3GRo (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 02:17:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751140AbWG3GRo (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 02:17:44 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:42447 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751135AbWG3GRn (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 02:17:43 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ukTP32OZRZncyK3jhzs++3Vu3jEzQcmjF1wdH1emJYLRqWfXFFJpxYgRKYM9WgCrJHALV2qFh26RMk5oPYXx4C8eRWO02XI3ruBQ6AqY3+OCAd1+xidKGIpj1zs4KSGNc+XDhJOCekce/RsV2VxmHySD7nFzgym2bnMcMxgfMVw= Message-ID: <9a8748490607292317t405c906ek8b1577920eeace65@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:17:42 +0200 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Hans Reiser" Subject: Re: possible recursive locking detected - while running fs operations in loops - 2.6.18-rc2-git5 Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Alexander Viro" , "Al Viro" , reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <44CBEA7A.4010308@namesys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9a8748490607251516j1433306ek9c64cc84c0838f7b@mail.gmail.com> <20060725232924.GU6452@schatzie.adilger.int> <9a8748490607291518m59573244wac00486a64f6385b@mail.gmail.com> <44CBEA7A.4010308@namesys.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 30/07/06, Hans Reiser wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > > > Thanks. That's a nice little test suite. > > > Yes, it is quite useful, our developers have added it to the regression > suite.... > That's nice. Now how about that lock validator message I managed to tease out? Akpm said "... the reiserfs locking appears to be unneeded - this inode is going down and nobody else can look it up, so what is to be locked against?" - can you comment on that? -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html