From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932454AbWG3TZD (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:25:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932455AbWG3TZB (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:25:01 -0400 Received: from [72.14.214.204] ([72.14.214.204]:42951 "EHLO hu-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932454AbWG3TZB (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:25:01 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=knkDksXgCyOk/IJNJ2VWCirP5wMSnNvyRJKe/a5WFp4JJdeu2t5LZzAuCjvXbKvxvyzyRNAoKKTAmelnTYOmKLebHtjPiEUXBHxsVbwNKqJYCI3XlE9In3Y5PogCrgI03N22bya7Ed7YbgK483c1J6nHkVky5L2qga/ZPbNsNXA= Message-ID: <9a8748490607301224y63e7e9ah895722efe4c6e371@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 21:24:59 +0200 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] making the kernel -Wshadow clean - The initial step Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Nikita Danilov" , "Joe Perches" , "Martin Waitz" , "Jan-Benedict Glaw" , "Christoph Hellwig" , "David Woodhouse" , "Arjan van de Ven" , "Dmitry Torokhov" , "Valdis Kletnieks" , "Sam Ravnborg" , "Russell King" , "Rusty Russell" , "Randy Dunlap" , "Jesper Juhl" In-Reply-To: <200607301830.01659.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200607301830.01659.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 30/07/06, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Ok, here we go again... > > This is a series of patches that try to be an initial step towards making > the kernel build -Wshadow clean. > Replying to myself here since I forgot one little bit. It would be great if maintainers of the various areas that my patches touch would explicitly ack or nack patches - preferably giving reasons for nack's as well. That would help me a lot in updating the patch-set (if so needed). Thanks. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html