From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: "Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@osdl.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Simple script that locks up my box with recent kernels
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:41:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a8748490611240141o4d285317h3c1e2110f515e141@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061124065209.GX4999@kernel.dk>
On 24/11/06, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > Does the box survive io intensive workloads?
> >
> > It seems to. It does get sluggish as hell when there is lots of disk I/O but
> > it seems to be able to survive.
> > I'll try some more, with some IO benchmarks + various other stuff to see
> > if I can get it to die that way.
>
> Just wondering if you have a marginal powersupply, perhaps.
>
It is a possibility, but I doubt it, since if I use a 2.6.17.x kernel
then things are rock solid and I can't cause a lockup even if I leave
my box building kernels in the background for days.
> > > Have you tried using net or
> > > serial console to see if it spits out any info before it crashes?
> >
> > Lacking a second box at the moment, so that's not an option currently :(
>
> It's likely a requirement to get any further with this issue, I'm
> afraid. Nobody can debug this thing blind folded.
>
I'll see if I can get my hands on a second box.
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-24 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-06 23:36 Jesper Juhl
2006-10-06 23:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-07 0:06 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-07 0:21 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-07 3:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-07 21:02 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-07 21:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-08 23:33 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-16 22:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-16 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-16 23:13 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-23 20:30 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-22 0:46 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-22 2:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-22 3:25 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-22 3:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-22 3:49 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-22 10:32 ` Pádraig Brady
2006-11-22 17:58 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-22 8:03 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-22 10:55 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-22 10:57 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-22 11:04 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-22 11:07 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-23 23:52 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-24 6:52 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-24 9:41 ` Jesper Juhl [this message]
2006-11-24 9:46 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-24 9:52 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-23 10:22 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-23 23:48 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-22 11:00 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-24 0:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-07 3:40 ` Grant Coady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a8748490611240141o4d285317h3c1e2110f515e141@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®