mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: "David Chinner" <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com,
	"Keith Owens" <kaos@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1138 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c (kernel 2.6.18.1)
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:48:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a8748490612100748w5caa69c5we3e35c2d18a836e2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490611292151m57cdbf4kacebb4dd20b95147@mail.gmail.com>

On 30/11/06, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30/11/06, David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 10:17:25AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > On 29/11/06, David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> wrote:
> > > >On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 04:49:00PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > >> Filesystem "dm-1": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1138 of
> > > >> file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.  Caller 0xffffffff8034b47e
> > > >>

For your information; I just got this again with a different
filesystem (see below).

> > > >> Call Trace:
> > > >> [<ffffffff8020b122>] show_trace+0xb2/0x380
> > > >> [<ffffffff8020b405>] dump_stack+0x15/0x20
> > > >> [<ffffffff80327b4c>] xfs_error_report+0x3c/0x50
> > > >> [<ffffffff803435ae>] xfs_trans_cancel+0x6e/0x130
> > > >> [<ffffffff8034b47e>] xfs_create+0x5ee/0x6a0
> > > >> [<ffffffff80356556>] xfs_vn_mknod+0x156/0x2e0
> > > >> [<ffffffff803566eb>] xfs_vn_create+0xb/0x10
> > > >> [<ffffffff80284b2c>] vfs_create+0x8c/0xd0
> > > >> [<ffffffff802e734a>] nfsd_create_v3+0x31a/0x560
> > > >> [<ffffffff802ec838>] nfsd3_proc_create+0x148/0x170
> > > >> [<ffffffff802e19f9>] nfsd_dispatch+0xf9/0x1e0
> > > >> [<ffffffff8049d617>] svc_process+0x437/0x6e0
> > > >> [<ffffffff802e176d>] nfsd+0x1cd/0x360
> > > >> [<ffffffff8020ab1c>] child_rip+0xa/0x12
> > > >> xfs_force_shutdown(dm-1,0x8) called from line 1139 of file
> > > >> fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.  Return address = 0xffffffff80359daa
> > > >
> > > >We shut down the filesystem because we cancelled a dirty transaction.
> > > >Once we start to dirty the incore objects, we can't roll back to
> > > >an unchanged state if a subsequent fatal error occurs during the
> > > >transaction and we have to abort it.
> > > >
> > > So you are saying that there's nothing I can do to prevent this from
> > > happening in the future?
> >
> > Pretty much - we need to work out what is going wrong and
> > we can't from teh shutdown message above - the error has
> > occurred in a path that doesn't have error report traps
> > in it.
> >
> > Is this reproducable?
> >
> Not on demand, no. It has happened only this once as far as I know and
> for unknown reasons.
>
This time it *is* reproducible, so if you want me to try something let
me know fast since I have to delete the fs as soon as I have copied
all the data to a new one.


> > > >If I understand historic occurrences of this correctly, there is
> > > >a possibility that it can be triggered in ENOMEM situations. Was your
> > > >machine running out of memoy when this occurred?
> > > >
> > > Not really. I just checked my monitoring software and, at the time
> > > this happened, the box had ~5.9G RAM free (of 8G total) and no swap
> > > used (but 11G available).
> >
> > Ok. Sounds like we need more error reporting points inserted
> > into that code so we dump an error earlier and hence have some
> > hope of working out what went wrong next time.....
> >
> > OOC, there weren't any I/O errors reported before this shutdown?
> >
> No. I looked but found none.
>

This time the server was running 2.6.19 :

Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel: Filesystem "dm-6": XFS internal
error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1138 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.
Caller 0xffffffff8034263c
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel: Call Trace:
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff8020aefc>] dump_trace+0xb3/0x42e
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff8020b2b3>] show_trace+0x3c/0x55
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff8020b2e1>] dump_stack+0x15/0x17
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff8031e91f>]
xfs_error_report+0x3c/0x3e
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff8033975b>]
xfs_trans_cancel+0x65/0x109
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff8034263c>] xfs_create+0x5bb/0x613
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff8034b43e>]
xfs_vn_mknod+0x141/0x2b6
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff8034b5ce>] xfs_vn_create+0xb/0xd
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff80278721>] vfs_create+0x7a/0xb1
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff802e0a9f>]
nfsd_create_v3+0x300/0x548
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff802e69f9>]
nfsd3_proc_create+0x152/0x164
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff802daf4a>]
nfsd_dispatch+0xea/0x1bd
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff8049cdb3>] svc_process+0x3ee/0x6fb
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff802db54b>] nfsd+0x198/0x2bd
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:  [<ffffffff8020a7a8>] child_rip+0xa/0x12
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel:
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel: xfs_force_shutdown(dm-6,0x8) called
from line 1139 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.  Return address =
0xffffffff8034e9ed
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel: Filesystem "dm-6": Corruption of
in-memory data detected.  Shutting down filesystem: dm-6
Dec 10 15:09:21 nfsserver2 kernel: Please umount the filesystem, and
rectify the problem(s)
Dec 10 15:12:23 nfsserver2 kernel: nfsd: last server has exited
Dec 10 15:12:23 nfsserver2 kernel: nfsd: unexporting all filesystems
Dec 10 15:12:26 nfsserver2 kernel: xfs_force_shutdown(dm-6,0x1) called
from line 424 of file fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c.  Return addres s =
0xffffffff8034e9ed

If I unmount and then remount the filesystem the log gets replayed OK,
I can then unmount it and run xfs_repair on it and it finds no
problems, *but* when I then mount it again and the webserver that uses
the filesystem access it via NFS it explodes again - every single
time, it's quite reproducible.
I'm currently in the process of copying all the data to a new XFS
filesystem in the hope that the new filesystem will be OK - the copy
seems to be proceeding fine.
Unfortunately I can't keep the current filesystem around for
diagnostics work since it's a production server and I don't have space
available to let the old and new copy co-exist, so I have to delete
the current one as soon as I have copied all the data off.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-10 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-28 15:49 Jesper Juhl
2006-11-29  1:32 ` David Chinner
2006-11-29  9:17   ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-30  2:07     ` David Chinner
2006-11-30  5:51       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-12-10 15:48         ` Jesper Juhl [this message]
     [not found]       ` <87bqm89y6g.wl%shinichiro@stained-g.net>
2006-12-13  6:25         ` 2.6.18.3 also 2.6.19 XFS xfs_force_shutdown (was: XFS internal error [...]) David Chinner
     [not found]           ` <877iwu3k9e.wl%shinichiro@stained-g.net>
2006-12-15  4:07             ` David Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a8748490612100748w5caa69c5we3e35c2d18a836e2@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=kaos@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®