From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030524AbXCSSir (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:38:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030567AbXCSSir (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:38:47 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.229]:54066 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030524AbXCSSiq (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:38:46 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OQELtxbcb1xbYsrebNbtMNdaW94gxMHQhtVZCeCDqS0mzpOYrY6vf3aZ0g8iQ0PdFOQGDwV1vVfotmNtDuAx5uxc4zC0ltTX2R/vkO1pL+fWMX1yzQmPN8iKrWXPoYFbXD3f8r4Qkt6R3k41cpugnLaKFO/X78LvXoYy+enLBF4= Message-ID: <9a8748490703191138y7ff45fdbl538d2a941414817e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:38:45 +0100 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Jesper Juhl" , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fastboot@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0) In-Reply-To: <20070319183710.GA23499@strauss.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070319181336.GC12628@strauss.suse.de> <9a8748490703191129h396211e9q59eeea9533d00c38@mail.gmail.com> <20070319183710.GA23499@strauss.suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle wrote: > * Jesper Juhl [2007-03-19 19:29]: > > > > > > -void > > > +int > > > register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action) > > > { > > > > Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the > > return type on the same line as the function name, so why not get > > these in-line while you are modifying them anyway? > > Because all other functions in that file are coded this way. I think > it looks better if you don't change the style in a particular file. > Am I wrong? > Consistency within the file certainly makes sense. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html