From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760187AbXGDBIl (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:08:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755778AbXGDBIe (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:08:34 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]:7025 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755093AbXGDBId (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:08:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kqaKaLv3tSFmR5BZIHI1cVhn6bHj8dyZiguDq8Xt8a3acg+1TU1OOR/5YWQN6g3gWahkid5IqnGXVFs2+ma1NyAq+CvsAN6xrBDHU+7FWB6do6oEkaQGU8S4b8ufS7OMusDrPPvAJmr5eeFRFNV/vwTeZPjHIY3vyN3FymLpGHE= Message-ID: <9a8748490707031808m73093345i141b772b283a9d04@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 03:08:32 +0200 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: [PATCH][Documentation][resend] Add missing files and dirs to 00-INDEX in Documentation/ Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Randy Dunlap" , trivial@kernel.org, "Rob Landley" In-Reply-To: <20070703125852.0172a588.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200707010106.00181.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> <20070703125852.0172a588.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/07/07, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 01:05:59 +0200 > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > This patch adds descriptions for a number of missing files and directories > > to the Documentation/00-INDEX file. > > People really should learn to keep this file up-to-date when adding or > > moving documentation... > > Or just delete it. Does anyone use it? > I know I use it (that's partly why I noticed that stuff was missing). Sure we could just delete it and the loss wouldn't be too great, but in any case, as long as we do have that file in there I feel that it ought to be up-to-date. > That's Rob's problem, I guess. > Let's leave final judgement of the patch to Rob then. That's fine by me. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html