From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765693AbXHDTAW (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 15:00:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765107AbXHDTAL (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 15:00:11 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.246]:25547 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760058AbXHDTAJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 15:00:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RpIKnGbk30tZN9XKM7fNGH9NaOWXF8bbneX/0o5yEtijzbr5ycvK31lncMiNKHSyCT53rG0xMubxsr18IsxLrB89OmJN17SRH2G73O+1rA4kK51RfCy5HuY6TTT4XRcZsOUWTmWe+bfRbJMteU+ol9Q6z0dqEx7Re8+/4Sy92KI= Message-ID: <9a8748490708041200n6bd8ac59x4b45fe5a1177ffc9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:00:08 +0200 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Christoph Hellwig" , "Jesper Juhl" , "Andrew Morton" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Clarify the GPL version of contributions by Jesper Juhl in CREDITS In-Reply-To: <20070804185715.GB28051@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200708042031.32704.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> <20070804185715.GB28051@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/08/07, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 08:31:32PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > (resending trivial patch, originally from 18/6-2007 02:33) > > > > > > Just to make things clear in the light of recent discussions about > > licensing. > > Stuff I contribute to the Linux kernel are licensed under the terms of the > > GPL version 2. > > This really doesn't elong into CREDITS. If you're not good enough with > the general GPLv2 stance add additional diclaimers to the files you've > made changes to (in an extent that is copyrightable) > Ok, I can live with that. I just got paranoid after all the recent GVLv2 vs GPLv3 flamewars and though it would be best to just add some explicit note somewhere and couldn't find a more appropriate place than CREDITS to do so. Feel free to drop this patch... -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html