From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: xiang@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
zhujia.zj@bytedance.com, houtao1@huawei.com
Cc: huyue2@coolpad.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] erofs: simplify the name collision checking in share domain mode
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:01:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ac23fbe-7bfe-68f6-a9b5-6c722d0fe629@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <489d47915bcc71ef3c3ec7b8a437ec6e09c4c3db.1675840368.git.jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
On 2/8/23 3:17 PM, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> When share domain is enabled, data blobs can be shared among filesystem
> instances in the same domain for data deduplication, while bootstrap
> blobs are always dedicated to the corresponding filesystem instance, and
> have no need to be shared.
>
> In the initial implementation of share domain (commit 7d41963759fe
> ("erofs: Support sharing cookies in the same domain")), bootstrap blobs
> are also in the share domain, and thus can be referenced by the
> following filesystem instances. In this case, mounting twice with the
> same fsid and domain_id will trigger warning in sysfs. Commit
> 27f2a2dcc626 ("erofs: check the uniqueness of fsid in shared domain in
> advance") fixes this by introducing the name collision checking.
>
> This patch attempts to fix the above issue in another simpler way.
> Since the bootstrap blobs have no need to be shared, move them out of
> the share domain, so that one bootstrap blob can not be referenced by
> other filesystem instances. Attempt to mount twice with the same fsid
> and domain_id will fail with info of duplicate cookies, which is
> consistent with the behavior in non-share-domain mode.
>
In non-share-domain mode, the uniqueness of primary data blob is
actually guaranteed by fscache_acquire_volume(), since
fscache_acquire_volume() will fail if attempt to mount the same fsid twice.
Thus hold on for this patch.
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-09 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-08 7:15 [PATCH 0/4] erofs: cleanup for fscache " Jingbo Xu
2023-02-08 7:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] erofs: remove unused device mapping in meta routine Jingbo Xu
2023-02-08 7:21 ` [External] " Jia Zhu
2023-02-08 7:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] erofs: maintain cookies of share domain in self-contained list Jingbo Xu
2023-02-08 8:16 ` [External] " Jia Zhu
2023-02-08 7:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] erofs: unify anonymous inodes for blob Jingbo Xu
2023-02-08 9:01 ` [External] " Jia Zhu
2023-02-08 7:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] erofs: simplify the name collision checking in share domain mode Jingbo Xu
2023-02-09 2:43 ` Jia Zhu
2023-02-09 5:01 ` Jingbo Xu [this message]
2023-02-08 7:32 ` [PATCH] erofs: relinquish volume with mutex held Jingbo Xu
2023-02-08 9:09 ` [External] " Jia Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ac23fbe-7bfe-68f6-a9b5-6c722d0fe629@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=huyue2@coolpad.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiang@kernel.org \
--cc=zhujia.zj@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®