mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wangkeqi  <wangkeqi_chris@163.com>
To: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com,  netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 wangkeqi <wangkeqiwang@didiglobal.com>
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] connector: Change the judgment conditions for clearing proc_event_num_listeners
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 17:26:39 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ac38d2.916d.18d0c71c748.Coremail.wangkeqi_chris@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7170ecaf-32e3-4bfc-b20d-a08a341ae381@intel.com>


From: wangkeqi <wangkeqiwang@didiglobal.com>

It is inaccurate to judge whether proc_event_num_listeners is
cleared by cn_netlink_send_mult returning -ESRCH.
In the case of stress-ng netlink-proc, -ESRCH will always be returned,
because netlink_broadcast_filtered will return -ESRCH,
which may cause stress-ng netlink-proc performance degradation.
Therefore, the judgment condition is modified to whether
there is a listener.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401112259.b23a1567-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: wangkeqi <wangkeqiwang@didiglobal.com>
Cc: fengwei.yin@intel.com
---
 drivers/connector/cn_proc.c   | 6 ++++--
 drivers/connector/connector.c | 6 ++++++
 include/linux/connector.h     | 1 +
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
index 3d5e6d705..b09f74ed3 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
@@ -108,8 +108,10 @@ static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
 		filter_data[1] = 0;
 	}
 
-	if (cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
-			     cn_filter, (void *)filter_data) == -ESRCH)
+	if (netlink_has_listeners(get_cdev_nls(), CN_IDX_PROC))
+		cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
+			     cn_filter, (void *)filter_data);
+	else
 		atomic_set(&proc_event_num_listeners, 0);
 
 	local_unlock(&local_event.lock);
diff --git a/drivers/connector/connector.c b/drivers/connector/connector.c
index 7f7b94f61..1b2cd410e 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/connector.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/connector.c
@@ -129,6 +129,12 @@ int cn_netlink_send(struct cn_msg *msg, u32 portid, u32 __group,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cn_netlink_send);
 
+struct sock *get_cdev_nls(void)
+{
+	return cdev.nls;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_cdev_nls);
+
 /*
  * Callback helper - queues work and setup destructor for given data.
  */
diff --git a/include/linux/connector.h b/include/linux/connector.h
index cec2d99ae..255466aea 100644
--- a/include/linux/connector.h
+++ b/include/linux/connector.h
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid,
  */
 int cn_netlink_send(struct cn_msg *msg, u32 portid, u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask);
 
+struct sock *get_cdev_nls(void);
 int cn_queue_add_callback(struct cn_queue_dev *dev, const char *name,
 			  const struct cb_id *id,
 			  void (*callback)(struct cn_msg *, struct netlink_skb_parms *));
-- 

2.27.0


The last email is not plain text, I will send it again.











At 2024-01-15 15:57:23, "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 1/15/2024 3:51 PM, wangkeqi wrote:
>> From: wangkeqi <wangkeqiwang@didiglobal.com>
>> 
>> It is inaccurate to judge whether proc_event_num_listeners is
>> cleared by cn_netlink_send_mult returning -ESRCH.
>> In the case of stress-ng netlink-proc, -ESRCH will always be returned,
>> because netlink_broadcast_filtered will return -ESRCH,
>> which may cause stress-ng netlink-proc performance degradation.
>> Therefore, the judgment condition is modified to whether
>> there is a listener.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: wangkeqi <wangkeqiwang@didiglobal.com>
>
>Regarding the original report:
>
>If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new 
>version of
>the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
>| Closes: 
>https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401112259.b23a1567-oliver.sang@intel.com
>
>
>Could you please add the tag? Thanks.
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/connector/cn_proc.c   | 6 ++++--
>>   drivers/connector/connector.c | 6 ++++++
>>   include/linux/connector.h     | 1 +
>>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
>> index 3d5e6d705..b09f74ed3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
>> @@ -108,8 +108,10 @@ static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
>>   		filter_data[1] = 0;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	if (cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
>> -			     cn_filter, (void *)filter_data) == -ESRCH)
>> +	if (netlink_has_listeners(get_cdev_nls(), CN_IDX_PROC))
>> +		cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
>> +			     cn_filter, (void *)filter_data);
>> +	else
>>   		atomic_set(&proc_event_num_listeners, 0);
>>   
>>   	local_unlock(&local_event.lock);
>> diff --git a/drivers/connector/connector.c b/drivers/connector/connector.c
>> index 7f7b94f61..1b2cd410e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/connector/connector.c
>> +++ b/drivers/connector/connector.c
>> @@ -129,6 +129,12 @@ int cn_netlink_send(struct cn_msg *msg, u32 portid, u32 __group,
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cn_netlink_send);
>>   
>> +struct sock *get_cdev_nls(void)
>> +{
>> +	return cdev.nls;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_cdev_nls);
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * Callback helper - queues work and setup destructor for given data.
>>    */
>> diff --git a/include/linux/connector.h b/include/linux/connector.h
>> index cec2d99ae..255466aea 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/connector.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/connector.h
>> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid,
>>    */
>>   int cn_netlink_send(struct cn_msg *msg, u32 portid, u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask);
>>   
>> +struct sock *get_cdev_nls(void);
>>   int cn_queue_add_callback(struct cn_queue_dev *dev, const char *name,
>>   			  const struct cb_id *id,
>>   			  void (*callback)(struct cn_msg *, struct netlink_skb_parms *));

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-15  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-15  7:51 wangkeqi
2024-01-15  7:57 ` Yin, Fengwei
2024-01-15  9:26   ` wangkeqi [this message]
2024-01-15 23:59     ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ac38d2.916d.18d0c71c748.Coremail.wangkeqi_chris@163.com \
    --to=wangkeqi_chris@163.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangkeqiwang@didiglobal.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®