From: "Chuck Lever" <cel@kernel.org>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
"Ameer Hamza" <ameer.hamza@truenas.com>
Cc: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
"Olga Kornievskaia" <okorniev@redhat.com>,
"Dai Ngo" <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, "Tom Talpey" <tom@talpey.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] NFSD: Fix duplicate fsnotify access events for iterator READs
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:03:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ad95194-983d-427d-9a07-c9eb0891d1a0@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aoVHBkmPNSRakbYW@infradead.org>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2026, at 2:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Well, that is the underlying bug here. ->splice_read should not
> skip fsnotify events and nfsd should not work around this as
> fsnotify is not the business of the users of VFS APIs.
I asked for the duplicate event to be split out of Ameer's larger
series as a backportable fix because there is clearly a bug here.
But NFSD might not be the correct place to address it.
Today the fsnotify event comes from the system call implementations,
not from the splice helpers. do_sendfile() calls fsnotify_access()
once do_splice_direct() returns, and do_splice() does the same for
splice(2), while vfs_splice_read() and splice_direct_to_actor()
emit nothing. vfs_iocb_iter_read() is the outlier, emitting from
inside the helper.
NFSD calls splice_direct_to_actor() directly, so on that path it
acts like do_sendfile() and emits the event itself. That is why
the fsnotify event counts differ between NFSD's two read paths.
Moving the fsnotify call site down into ->splice_read would double
up sendfile events unless the system call implementations stop
emitting it at the same time.
Jan, Amir, what are your thoughts?
--
Chuck Lever
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 22:57 Ameer Hamza
2026-08-18 22:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] NFSD: Update the atime " Ameer Hamza
2026-08-19 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-19 14:27 ` Chuck Lever
2026-08-19 6:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] NFSD: Fix duplicate fsnotify access events " Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-19 14:03 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-08-22 10:21 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-23 16:21 ` Chuck Lever
2026-08-24 8:36 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-24 4:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-24 9:26 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ad95194-983d-427d-9a07-c9eb0891d1a0@app.fastmail.com \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=ameer.hamza@truenas.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®