mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@aristanetworks.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH] x86/pci: Detect mmconfig on nVidia MCP55 -v2
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:57:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ae48b020902101457o575f8eb0qa72120efea521c46@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4990DFBA.1050401@kernel.org>

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@aristanetworks.com>
>
> Detect and enable memory-mapped PCI configuration space on the nVidia
> MCP55 southbridge.  Tested against 2.6.27.4 on an Arista Networks
> development board with one MCP55, Coreboot firmware, no ACPI.
>
> v2: add multi mcp55 support, and conexist with amd quad core system by Yinghai
>    also only enable it only when acpi=off or acpi is not built-in
>
> Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk@aristanetworks.com>

A couple of comments below. Let me test this version before signing off.

> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>
> ---
>  arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c |   64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,68 @@ static const char __init *pci_mmcfg_amd_
>        return "AMD Family 10h NB";
>  }
>
> +static bool __initdata mcp55_checked;
> +static const char __init *pci_mmcfg_nvidia_mcp55(void)
> +{
> +       int bus;
> +       int mcp55_mmconf_found = 0;
> +
> +       static const u32 extcfg_regnum          = 0x90;
> +       static const u32 extcfg_regsize         = 4;
> +       static const u32 extcfg_enable_mask     = 1<<31;
> +       static const u32 extcfg_start_mask      = 0xff<<16;
> +       static const int extcfg_start_shift     = 16;
> +       static const u32 extcfg_size_mask       = 0x3<<28;
> +       static const int extcfg_size_shift      = 28;
> +       static const int extcfg_sizebus[]       = {0x100, 0x80, 0x40, 0x20};
> +       static const u32 extcfg_base_mask[]     = {0x7ff8, 0x7ffc, 0x7ffe, 0x7fff};
> +       static const int extcfg_base_lshift     = 25;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * do check if amd fam10h already took over
> +        */
> +       if (!acpi_disabled || pci_mmcfg_config_num || mcp55_checked)
> +               return NULL;

Why skip this if !acpi_disabled? I thought we want to have the host
bridge mmconfig settings override the ACPI MCFG. At least that appears
to be the logic for other host bridges.

> +       mcp55_checked = true;
> +       for (bus = 0; bus < 256; bus++) {
> +               u64 base;
> +               u32 l, extcfg;
> +               u16 vendor, device;
> +               int start, size_index, end;
> +
> +               raw_pci_ops->read(0, bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), 0, 4, &l);

Don't we need to check devices 8, 16 and 24 as well as 0?

> +               vendor = l & 0xffff;
> +               device = (l >> 16) & 0xffff;
> +
> +               if (PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA != vendor || 0x0369 != device)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               raw_pci_ops->read(0, bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), extcfg_regnum,
> +                                 extcfg_regsize, &extcfg);
> +
> +               if (!(extcfg & extcfg_enable_mask))
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               if (extend_mmcfg(1) == -1)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               size_index = (extcfg & extcfg_size_mask) >> extcfg_size_shift;
> +               base = extcfg & extcfg_base_mask[size_index];
> +               /* base could > 4G */
> +               base <<= extcfg_base_lshift;
> +               start = (extcfg & extcfg_start_mask) >> extcfg_start_shift;
> +               end = start + extcfg_sizebus[size_index] - 1;
> +               fill_one_mmcfg(base, 0, start, end);
> +               mcp55_mmconf_found++;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!mcp55_mmconf_found)
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       return "nVidia MCP55";
> +}
> +
>  struct pci_mmcfg_hostbridge_probe {
>        u32 bus;
>        u32 devfn;
> @@ -183,6 +245,8 @@ static struct pci_mmcfg_hostbridge_probe
>          0x1200, pci_mmcfg_amd_fam10h },
>        { 0xff, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD,
>          0x1200, pci_mmcfg_amd_fam10h },
> +       { 0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA,
> +         0x0369, pci_mmcfg_nvidia_mcp55 },
>  };
>
>  static int __init cmp_mmcfg(const void *x1, const void *x2)
>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-10 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-04 16:39 [PATCH] Detect mmconfig on nVidia MCP55 Ed Swierk
2009-02-04 17:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 17:05   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-02-05 18:00     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 11:30       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-02-06 15:42         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:10           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-02-09 19:26   ` Ed Swierk
2009-02-09 19:42     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-04 17:07 ` Loic Prylli
2009-02-04 17:37   ` Ed Swierk
2009-02-04 20:00     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-04 20:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-04 21:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 23:10     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-10  1:59       ` [PATCH] x86/pci: host mmconfig detect clean up v3 Yinghai Lu
2009-02-10  2:00         ` Subject: [PATCH] x86/pci: Detect mmconfig on nVidia MCP55 -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-02-10 22:57           ` Ed Swierk [this message]
2009-02-11  5:05             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-11 22:00               ` Ed Swierk
2009-02-12  5:03           ` Ed Swierk
2009-02-12  5:02         ` [PATCH] x86/pci: host mmconfig detect clean up v3 Ed Swierk
2009-02-05  2:24     ` [PATCH] x86/pci: host mmconfig detect clean up v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-02-05 18:15       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 18:31         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-05 22:04           ` Ed Swierk
2009-02-05 22:36             ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ae48b020902101457o575f8eb0qa72120efea521c46@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=eswierk@aristanetworks.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome