From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
james@dingwall.me.uk, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xen: Return from panic notifier
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 09:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b3f955c-ad76-601f-2b58-fa9dc4608c72@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001151633.1659-1-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
On 01.10.2019 17:16, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Currently execution of panic() continues until Xen's panic notifier
> (xen_panic_event()) is called at which point we make a hypercall that
> never returns.
>
> This means that any notifier that is supposed to be called later as
> well as significant part of panic() code (such as pstore writes from
> kmsg_dump()) is never executed.
Back at the time when this was introduced into the XenoLinux tree,
I think this behavior was intentional for at least DomU-s. I wonder
whether you wouldn't want your change to further distinguish Dom0
and DomU behavior.
> There is no reason for xen_panic_event() to be this last point in
> execution since panic()'s emergency_restart() will call into
> xen_emergency_restart() from where we can perform our hypercall.
Did you consider, as an alternative, to lower the notifier's
priority?
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-02 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-01 15:16 Boris Ostrovsky
2019-10-02 4:36 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-10-02 7:40 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2019-10-02 13:24 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2019-10-02 13:42 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-02 14:14 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-10-02 14:59 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b3f955c-ad76-601f-2b58-fa9dc4608c72@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=james@dingwall.me.uk \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®