From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
To: Sahaj Chaudhari <sahaj123.sc@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/net: test tcp_rmem lower bound
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 08:14:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b4b59ac-6e64-4dd2-88c1-c3f7844bbd36@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007054508.1059927-1-sahaj123.sc@gmail.com>
On 10/7/26 07:45, Sahaj Chaudhari wrote:
> Exercise a tcp_rmem default below 4096 and verify that it is rejected.
> A tiny default can make TCP receive-window accounting space zero and
> trigger a divide-by-zero when the receive buffer grows.
>
> Run the test in a fresh network namespace and verify that rejection
> leaves the setting unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sahaj Chaudhari <sahaj123.sc@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_rmem_min.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_rmem_min.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore
> index dacd36ed8455..44de061e3eef 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ tcp_fastopen_backup_key
> tcp_inq
> tcp_mmap
> tcp_port_share
> +tcp_rmem_min
> tfo
> timestamping
> tls
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> index 590b33e16d9f..595f0e6c38b0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS := \
> so_incoming_cpu \
> tap \
> tcp_port_share \
> + tcp_rmem_min \
> tls \
> udp_splice_checksum \
> # end of TEST_GEN_PROGS
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_rmem_min.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_rmem_min.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..dd2305d7e599
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_rmem_min.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <sched.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +
> +#include "kselftest.h"
> +
> +#define TCP_RMEM_PATH "/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem"
> +
> +static int read_tcp_rmem(char *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + int fd = open(TCP_RMEM_PATH, O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
> + ssize_t len;
> +
> + if (fd < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + len = read(fd, buf, size - 1);
> + close(fd);
> + if (len < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + buf[len] = '\0';
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + /* tcp_rmem is min, default, max; keep min valid and lower the default. */
> + static const char invalid_default[] = "4096 1 6291456";
> + char before[128], after[128];
> + ssize_t len;
> + int fd, write_errno;
> +
> + ksft_print_header();
> + ksft_set_plan(1);
> +
> + if (unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)) {
> + if (errno == EPERM || errno == EACCES)
> + ksft_exit_skip("network namespace unavailable\n");
> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)");
> + }
> +
> + if (read_tcp_rmem(before, sizeof(before)))
> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("read tcp_rmem before write");
> +
> + fd = open(TCP_RMEM_PATH, O_WRONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
> + if (fd < 0)
> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("open tcp_rmem");
> +
> + len = write(fd, invalid_default, sizeof(invalid_default) - 1);
> + write_errno = errno;
> + close(fd);
> +
> + if (len >= 0) {
> + ksft_test_result_fail("tcp_rmem accepted a default below 4096\n");
> + ksft_finished();
> + }
> + if (write_errno != EINVAL && write_errno != ERANGE) {
> + errno = write_errno;
> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("write tcp_rmem");
> + }
> +
> + if (read_tcp_rmem(after, sizeof(after)))
> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("read tcp_rmem after rejected write");
> + if (strcmp(before, after)) {
I do not think we want one selftest per sysctl range check.
net/ has more than 500 sysctls, most of them with bounds. A test
asserting that tcp_rmem's lower bound is 4096 only restates the table,
and proc_dointvec_minmax() itself is already covered by
tools/testing/selftests/sysctl.
This does not scale: each of these adds a binary, a CI slot and
something to maintain. This one already breaks if tcp_rmem[0] is not
4096 (PAGE_SIZE > 4K, or tuned host), because elements are stored one
by one and the rejected write still changes the min.
What would be useful is a single generic test: in a fresh netns, walk
the writable /proc/sys/net entries, set each to the extreme values the
kernel accepts, run some loopback TCP/UDP traffic, and check that
nothing splats. No bounds to duplicate, new sysctls covered for free,
and it would have caught the divide by zero fixed in commit
83a945a529d6 ("tcp: do not let tcp_rmem be set below 4096").
Thanks.
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 5:45 Sahaj Chaudhari
2026-10-07 6:14 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b4b59ac-6e64-4dd2-88c1-c3f7844bbd36@kernel.org \
--to=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sahaj123.sc@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®