From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>,
dave@stgolabs.net, jic23@kernel.org, alison.schofield@intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, djbw@kernel.org,
danwilliams@nvidia.com
Cc: iweiny@kernel.org, ming.li@zohomail.com, kobak@nvidia.com,
kaihengf@nvidia.com, kees@kernel.org, newtonl@nvidia.com,
kristinc@nvidia.com, mochs@nvidia.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] cxl/features: Reject Set Features output buffer smaller than the header
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 11:05:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b4fa4d0-78fe-44a8-9d32-c6dc599888ef@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626104102.53892-3-icheng@nvidia.com>
On 6/26/26 3:41 AM, Richard Cheng wrote:
> cxlctl_set_feature() sizes its output buffer from the user's
> fwctl_rpc.out_len but never checks it is large enough to hold even the
> fwctl_rpc_cxl_out header. With out_len == 0 , kvzalloc() returns
> ZERO_SIZE_PTR, which passes the !rpc_out check, the subsequent
> rpc_out->size = 0 then writes through the poison pointer.
>
> Reject requests whose output buffer can't hold the response header,
> before allocating. The Set Feature reply carries no payload, so the
> header is all that is required.
>
> Fixes: eb5dfcb9e36d ("cxl: Add support to handle user feature commands for set feature")
> Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - New patch.
>
> drivers/cxl/core/features.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/features.c b/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> index 9c714ee42a41..ed18ccb5e236 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> @@ -520,6 +520,9 @@ static void *cxlctl_set_feature(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs,
> flags = le32_to_cpu(feat_in->flags);
> out_size = *out_len;
>
> + if (out_size < offsetof(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out, payload))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *rpc_out __free(kvfree) =
> kvzalloc(out_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!rpc_out)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 10:40 [PATCH v3 0/3] cxl/features: Bounds-check the fwctl feature commands Richard Cheng
2026-06-26 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] cxl/features: Reject Get Feature count larger than the output buffer Richard Cheng
2026-07-14 19:29 ` Alison Schofield
2026-06-26 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] cxl/features: Reject Set Features output buffer smaller than the header Richard Cheng
2026-07-14 18:05 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2026-07-14 19:30 ` Alison Schofield
2026-06-26 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cxl/features: Clamp Get Feature output size to the remaining buffer Richard Cheng
2026-07-14 18:06 ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-14 19:31 ` Alison Schofield
2026-07-13 7:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] cxl/features: Bounds-check the fwctl feature commands Richard Cheng
2026-07-14 21:01 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b4fa4d0-78fe-44a8-9d32-c6dc599888ef@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=danwilliams@nvidia.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kaihengf@nvidia.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kristinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox