mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: "5mghybrid@khu.ac.kr" <5mghybrid@khu.ac.kr>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "kvalo@kernel.org" <kvalo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com" <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rtw-next v3 3/3] wifi: rtl8xxxu: preserve RX requests across recoverable transfer errors
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 03:46:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b5c31541fc8430b9d4205dcdff9e76e@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920-codex-rtl-rx-v3-submit-v3-3-883d11351963@khu.ac.kr>

Kim Wooseok via B4 Relay <devnull+5mghybrid.khu.ac.kr@kernel.org> wrote:

[...]

> @@ -5855,9 +5856,8 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_alloc_rx_urbs(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)
>  }
> 
>  static void rtl8xxxu_queue_rx_urb(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv,
> -                                 struct rtl8xxxu_rx_urb *rx_urb)
> +                                 struct rtl8xxxu_rx_urb *rx_urb, bool retry)

'retry' --> 'defer_schedule'?

>  {
> -       struct sk_buff *skb;
>         unsigned long flags;
> 
>         spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->rx_urb_lock, flags);
> @@ -5865,16 +5865,13 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_queue_rx_urb(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv,
>         if (!priv->shutdown) {
>                 list_add_tail(&rx_urb->list, &priv->rx_urb_pending_list);
>                 priv->rx_urb_pending_count++;
> -               /*
> -                * Arm the worker under rx_urb_lock so this is atomic with the
> -                * shutdown check: moving it out of the lock would let a
> -                * completion arm the work after rtl8xxxu_stop() canceled it.
> -                */
> -               if (priv->rx_urb_pending_count > RTL8XXXU_RX_URB_PENDING_WATER)
> -                       schedule_work(&priv->rx_urb_wq);
> +               /* Serialize scheduling with the shutdown check and cancellation. */
> +               if (retry)
> +                       queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &priv->rx_urb_wq,
> +                                          msecs_to_jiffies(RTL8XXXU_RX_URB_RETRY_DELAY_MS));
> +               else if (priv->rx_urb_pending_count > RTL8XXXU_RX_URB_PENDING_WATER)
> +                       mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &priv->rx_urb_wq, 0);

Not prefer using bare system_wq.
Can both use schedule_delayed_work()? 

>         } else {
> -               skb = (struct sk_buff *)rx_urb->urb.context;
> -               dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
>                 usb_free_urb(&rx_urb->urb);
>         }
> 

[...]

> @@ -6585,10 +6583,23 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_rx_complete(struct urb *urb)
> 
>                 skb = NULL;
>                 rx_urb->urb.context = NULL;
> -               rtl8xxxu_queue_rx_urb(priv, rx_urb);
> +               rtl8xxxu_queue_rx_urb(priv, rx_urb, false);
>         } else {
>                 dev_dbg(dev, "%s: status %i\n", __func__, urb->status);

nit: a blank line

> -               goto cleanup;
> +               switch (urb->status) {
> +               case -EPROTO:
> +               case -EILSEQ:
> +               case -ETIME:
> +               case -EOVERFLOW:
> +               case -ECOMM:
> +               case -ENOSR:
> +                       dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> +                       urb->context = NULL;
> +                       rtl8xxxu_queue_rx_urb(priv, rx_urb, true);
> +                       return;
> +               default:
> +                       goto cleanup;
> +               }
>         }
>         return;
> 

[...]


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-20  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-19 20:44 [PATCH rtw-next v3 0/3] wifi: rtl8xxxu: keep RX requests available across transient errors Kim Wooseok via B4 Relay
2026-09-19 20:44 ` [PATCH rtw-next v3 1/3] wifi: rtl8xxxu: free RX skb when URB submission fails Kim Wooseok via B4 Relay
2026-09-19 20:44 ` [PATCH rtw-next v3 2/3] wifi: rtl8xxxu: unwind incomplete receive startup Kim Wooseok via B4 Relay
2026-09-20  3:26   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-20  8:17     ` Kim Wooseok
2026-09-19 20:44 ` [PATCH rtw-next v3 3/3] wifi: rtl8xxxu: preserve RX requests across recoverable transfer errors Kim Wooseok via B4 Relay
2026-09-20  3:46   ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2026-09-20  8:17     ` Kim Wooseok
2026-09-21  0:24       ` Ping-Ke Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9b5c31541fc8430b9d4205dcdff9e76e@realtek.com \
    --to=pkshih@realtek.com \
    --cc=5mghybrid@khu.ac.kr \
    --cc=Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®