From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,
apopple@nvidia.com, shuah@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: guest_memfd: bind backing memory to a NUMA node
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 13:30:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b67424d-70e5-442b-9ec7-22b1d3db12f4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902194657.79075-1-gourry@gourry.net>
On 9/2/26 21:46, Gregory Price wrote:
> guest_memfd allocates its folios through a per-inode shared mempolicy.
>
> Today that policy can only be set after the fact, with mbind() on a host
> mmap of the fd. That requires the fd to be mappable, and it cannot reach
> folios that are only ever guest-faulted. Neither holds for a
> non-mappable (confidential) guest_memfd.
That looks like an investment into a mechanism we will soon consider legacy, so
I am not convinced this is the right approach?
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 19:46 Gregory Price
2026-09-02 19:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/mempolicy: add mempolicy_create() Gregory Price
2026-09-02 19:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/mempolicy: add mpol_set_shared_policy_range() Gregory Price
2026-09-02 19:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: guest_memfd: bind backing memory to a NUMA node at creation Gregory Price
2026-09-02 19:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests: KVM: guest_memfd: let the gmem_test() harness bind a node Gregory Price
2026-09-02 19:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests: KVM: guest_memfd: test GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_BIND_NODE Gregory Price
2026-09-09 22:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: guest_memfd: bind backing memory to a NUMA node Ackerley Tng
2026-09-09 23:10 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-09 23:23 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-09-09 23:41 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-10 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-10 13:39 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-10 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-10 11:30 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-09-10 13:40 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-10 14:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:46 ` Gregory Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b67424d-70e5-442b-9ec7-22b1d3db12f4@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®