Re: [PATCH] kunit: fix assert_type for KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG()

[Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>]

Hi everyone,

On Sun, 2022-08-21 at 16:59 +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> When replacing KUNIT_BINARY_LE_MSG_ASSERTION() with
> KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION() for KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG(), the assert_type
> parameter was changed from KUNIT_EXPECTATION to KUNIT_ASSERTION.  This
> causes KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() and KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG() to behave the
> same way, and tests after a failed KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() are not run.
> 
> Call KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTIO() with KUNIT_EXPECTATION for again match
> the documented behavior for KUNIT_EXPECT_* macros.
> 
> Fixes: 40f39777ce4f ("kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts")
> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
> ---

My apologies for the sloppiness, but I accidentally sent out an incomplete
version of this patch. Please disregards this patch, v2 is already posted.

Sorry for the noise!

Best,
Sander

>  include/kunit/test.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index c958855681cc..617ec995671d 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ do
> {                                                                             
>   \
>  
>  #define KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...)                     
> \
>         KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test,                                      
> \
> -                                  KUNIT_ASSERTION,                           
> \
> +                                  KUNIT_EXPECTATION,                         
> \
>                                    left, <=, right,                           
> \
>                                    fmt,                                       
> \
>                                     ##__VA_ARGS__)