mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: brijesh.singh@amd.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:50:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b7ba5a6-5b2d-206d-46f0-32e0dbd2af70@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180906140738.GA370@linux.intel.com>



On 09/06/2018 09:07 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
...

>> +
>> +/* This should cover upto 512 VCPUS (first 64 are covered by hv_clock_boot[]). */
>> +#define HVC_DECRYPTED_ARRAY_SIZE \
>> +	((PAGE_SIZE * 7)  / sizeof(struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info))
> 
> I think we can define the size relative to NR_CPUS rather than picking
> an arbitrary number of pages, maybe with a BUILD_BUG_ON to make sure
> the total size won't require a second 2mb page for __decrpyted.
> 
> #define HVC_DECRYPTED_ARRAY_SIZE  \
> 	PAGE_ALIGN((NR_CPUS - HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE) * \
> 		   sizeof(struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info))
> 

Sure works for me.

>> +static struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info
>> +			hv_clock_dec[HVC_DECRYPTED_ARRAY_SIZE] __decrypted_hvclock;
>> +
>>   static inline struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *this_cpu_pvti(void)
>>   {
>>   	return &this_cpu_read(hv_clock_per_cpu)->pvti;
>> @@ -267,10 +274,19 @@ static int kvmclock_setup_percpu(unsigned int cpu)
>>   		return 0;
>>   
>>   	/* Use the static page for the first CPUs, allocate otherwise */
>> -	if (cpu < HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE)
>> +	if (cpu < HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE) {
>>   		p = &hv_clock_boot[cpu];
>> -	else
>> -		p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	} else {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * When SEV is active, use the static pages from
>> +		 * .data..decrypted_hvclock section. The pages are already
>> +		 * mapped with C=0.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (sev_active())
>> +			p = &hv_clock_dec[cpu - HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE];
>> +		else
>> +			p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	}
> 
> Personal preference, but I think an if-elif-else with a single block
> comment would be easier to read.


I can do with that. thanks for your feedback.


> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Blah blah blah
> 	 */
> 	if (cpu < HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE)
> 		p = &hv_clock_boot[cpu];
> 	else if (sev_active())
> 		p = &hv_clock_dec[cpu - HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE];
> 	else
> 		p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-06 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-06 11:42 [PATCH v5 0/5] x86: Fix SEV guest regression Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 11:42 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] x86/mm: Restructure sme_encrypt_kernel() Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 11:42 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] x86/mm: fix sme_populate_pgd() to update page flags Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 11:43 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] x86/mm: add .data..decrypted section to hold shared variables Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 11:43 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] x86/kvm: use __decrypted attribute in " Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 11:43 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 12:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 13:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 14:18       ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 14:44         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 18:37         ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 18:47           ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 19:24             ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 19:46               ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 19:47               ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 20:20                 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 20:39                   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 21:56                     ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 14:43       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 14:56         ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 15:19           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 15:54             ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 18:33               ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 18:43                 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 18:45                 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 19:03                   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 17:50       ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 14:07   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 18:50     ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2018-09-07  3:57       ` Brijesh Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9b7ba5a6-5b2d-206d-46f0-32e0dbd2af70@amd.com \
    --to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome