From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A4CCD6E5D for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231936AbjJKLke (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2023 07:40:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53772 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231758AbjJKLkb (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2023 07:40:31 -0400 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0FD294; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 04:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D43C06607312; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 12:40:27 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1697024428; bh=OAMxSeQ6P5OM3kNDdwo69a8n51/BNIPMjIOkxQ7766s=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=NUigGBNW6cMl0UPf5ATiyCBG/6NiwnVGibUC7TWy9Fx2nq6JRWCzg78cLjmhRantd 24iERycqpetEV8+scZLms7O3eBWLmKVHMlVn4BLInT/lt0K/fEoEc9eKUVKrDu4QSj lh6LOOzhbgcNuMFpRZp+1c7LvdI237Kp+K2JZ1NdOh1OZllW+1t1/PP480J/9Yp+GG r6bz4f9/t91CkgCxjXv3HM2vQuFTbXApvxqqiRjupOwWnnZH7WnhPB32WlR60enX/9 9gjaon5QJQtNE7hGu5uLsjs51C89Fg68KqTOnkRt5OVQkMdNPzhMhlxssJ27A+YsPX xJYCkN1E+GjaA== Message-ID: <9b822d2d-7e2f-98f5-218c-22e0bb516a6a@collabora.com> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:40:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: revise VDOSYS RDMA node name To: Moudy Ho , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger Cc: "Nancy . Lin" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20231011075031.30660-1-moudy.ho@mediatek.com> <20231011075031.30660-3-moudy.ho@mediatek.com> Content-Language: en-US From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20231011075031.30660-3-moudy.ho@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 11/10/23 09:50, Moudy Ho ha scritto: > DMA-related nodes have their own standardized naming. Therefore, > the MT8195 VDOSYS RDMA has been unified and corrected. > Additionally, these modifications will facilitate the further > integration of bindings. > > Fixes: 92d2c23dc269 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: add display node for vdosys1") > Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno