From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: don't return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE from f2fs_write_single_data_page
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 15:09:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b8e24ac-500e-4d53-acbe-a9f97794a498@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507064437.GA31135@lst.de>
On 5/7/25 14:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 02:28:55PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
>>> index e016b0f96313..ce63b3bfb28f 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
>>> @@ -1565,10 +1565,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_raw_pages(struct compress_ctx *cc,
>>> NULL, NULL, wbc, io_type,
>>> compr_blocks, false);
>>> if (ret) {
>>> - if (ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) {
>>> - folio_unlock(folio);
>>> - ret = 0;
>>
>> Previously, for this case, it will goto out label rather than writing
>> left pages?
>
> Indeed. Is that the right thing to do here?
IIRC, once it failed to write one page, it redirties all left pages, and tries
to rewrite them again, it can avoid fragment as much as possible.
So can we keep original implementation here?
Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-07 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-05 9:25 cleanup AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE use in f2fs Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-05 9:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: return bool from __f2fs_write_meta_folio Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-07 6:22 ` Chao Yu
2025-05-08 16:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
2025-05-05 9:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: don't return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE from f2fs_write_single_data_page Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-07 6:28 ` Chao Yu
2025-05-07 6:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-07 7:09 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2025-05-05 9:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: simplify return value handling in f2fs_fsync_node_pages Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-07 7:19 ` Chao Yu
2025-05-05 9:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2f2: return bool from __write_node_folio Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-07 7:29 ` Chao Yu
2025-05-07 7:38 ` cleanup AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE use in f2fs Chao Yu
2025-05-07 7:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-07 8:13 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b8e24ac-500e-4d53-acbe-a9f97794a498@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®