From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] x86/membarrier: Get rid of a dubious optimization
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:50:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b8ecd9a017960c9e56ef3f3e733f32aa1194366.1606758530.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1606758530.git.luto@kernel.org>
sync_core_before_usermode() had an incorrect optimization. If we're
in an IRQ, we can get to usermode without IRET -- we just have to
schedule to a different task in the same mm and do SYSRET.
Fortunately, there were no callers of sync_core_before_usermode()
that could have had in_irq() or in_nmi() equal to true, because it's
only ever called from the scheduler.
While we're at it, clarify a related comment.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h | 9 +++++----
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
index 0fd4a9dfb29c..ab7382f92aff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
@@ -98,12 +98,13 @@ static inline void sync_core_before_usermode(void)
/* With PTI, we unconditionally serialize before running user code. */
if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
return;
+
/*
- * Return from interrupt and NMI is done through iret, which is core
- * serializing.
+ * Even if we're in an interrupt, we might reschedule before returning,
+ * in which case we could switch to a different thread in the same mm
+ * and return using SYSRET or SYSEXIT. Instead of trying to keep
+ * track of our need to sync the core, just sync right away.
*/
- if (in_irq() || in_nmi())
- return;
sync_core();
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 11666ba19b62..dabe683ab076 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -474,8 +474,10 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
/*
* The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier and
* core serialization before returning to user-space, after
- * storing to rq->curr. Writing to CR3 provides that full
- * memory barrier and core serializing instruction.
+ * storing to rq->curr, when changing mm. This is because membarrier()
+ * sends IPIs to all CPUs that are in the target mm, but another
+ * CPU switch to the target mm in the mean time. Writing to CR3
+ * provides that full memory barrier and core serializing instruction.
*/
if (real_prev == next) {
VM_WARN_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[prev_asid].ctx_id) !=
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 17:50 [PATCH 0/3] membarrier fixes Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-30 17:50 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2020-12-01 14:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/membarrier: Get rid of a dubious optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-01 17:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-30 17:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] membarrier: Add an actual barrier before rseq_preempt() Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 14:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-01 17:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-30 17:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] membarrier: Propagate SYNC_CORE and RSEQ actions more carefully Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 14:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-01 18:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 18:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-01 18:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 20:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-01 18:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 18:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b8ecd9a017960c9e56ef3f3e733f32aa1194366.1606758530.git.luto@kernel.org \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®