mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] x86/membarrier: Get rid of a dubious optimization
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:50:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b8ecd9a017960c9e56ef3f3e733f32aa1194366.1606758530.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1606758530.git.luto@kernel.org>

sync_core_before_usermode() had an incorrect optimization.  If we're
in an IRQ, we can get to usermode without IRET -- we just have to
schedule to a different task in the same mm and do SYSRET.
Fortunately, there were no callers of sync_core_before_usermode()
that could have had in_irq() or in_nmi() equal to true, because it's
only ever called from the scheduler.

While we're at it, clarify a related comment.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h | 9 +++++----
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c                | 6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
index 0fd4a9dfb29c..ab7382f92aff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
@@ -98,12 +98,13 @@ static inline void sync_core_before_usermode(void)
 	/* With PTI, we unconditionally serialize before running user code. */
 	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
 		return;
+
 	/*
-	 * Return from interrupt and NMI is done through iret, which is core
-	 * serializing.
+	 * Even if we're in an interrupt, we might reschedule before returning,
+	 * in which case we could switch to a different thread in the same mm
+	 * and return using SYSRET or SYSEXIT.  Instead of trying to keep
+	 * track of our need to sync the core, just sync right away.
 	 */
-	if (in_irq() || in_nmi())
-		return;
 	sync_core();
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 11666ba19b62..dabe683ab076 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -474,8 +474,10 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
 	/*
 	 * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier and
 	 * core serialization before returning to user-space, after
-	 * storing to rq->curr. Writing to CR3 provides that full
-	 * memory barrier and core serializing instruction.
+	 * storing to rq->curr, when changing mm.  This is because membarrier()
+	 * sends IPIs to all CPUs that are in the target mm, but another
+	 * CPU switch to the target mm in the mean time.  Writing to CR3
+	 * provides that full memory barrier and core serializing instruction.
 	 */
 	if (real_prev == next) {
 		VM_WARN_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[prev_asid].ctx_id) !=
-- 
2.28.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30 17:50 [PATCH 0/3] membarrier fixes Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-30 17:50 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2020-12-01 14:39   ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/membarrier: Get rid of a dubious optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-01 17:47     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-30 17:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] membarrier: Add an actual barrier before rseq_preempt() Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 10:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 14:31     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-01 17:55       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-30 17:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] membarrier: Propagate SYNC_CORE and RSEQ actions more carefully Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 10:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 14:28     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-01 18:12       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 18:29         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-01 18:48           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 20:51             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-12-01 18:09     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 18:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:55       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9b8ecd9a017960c9e56ef3f3e733f32aa1194366.1606758530.git.luto@kernel.org \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®