From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 15:45:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9befca58-2425-5b4f-2dab-98b3ed4037ac@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76534699-e270-b450-c18e-f7c35c325bcf@gmail.com>
Thank you.
I'll keep an eye on the progress.
On 2023/4/28 15:40, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 4/27/23 12:17, Gang Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looks like there are no objections or comments. Do you have any ideas?
>>
>> Can we merge this patch in the next merge window.
>>
>
> We're at 6.4 merge window, so the maintainer focus is to send PR updates
> to Linus. And this series didn't get applied before this merge window.
> Wait until 6.4-rc1 is out and reroll.
>
> Thanks.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-28 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-12 14:06 Gang Li
2023-04-12 14:10 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] sched/numa: use static_branch_inc/dec for sched_numa_balancing Gang Li
2023-04-12 14:11 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing Gang Li
2023-04-27 5:17 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Gang Li
2023-04-28 7:40 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-04-28 7:45 ` Gang Li [this message]
2023-05-17 9:28 ` Gang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9befca58-2425-5b4f-2dab-98b3ed4037ac@bytedance.com \
--to=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®