From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] scsi: ufs: Allow RTT negotiation
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 13:03:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c066dfb-b84b-49fc-94da-806b71e261d1@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240526081636.2064-2-avri.altman@wdc.com>
On 5/26/24 01:16, Avri Altman wrote:
> The rtt-upiu packets precede any data-out upiu packets, thus
> synchronizing the data input to the device: this mostly applies to write
> operations, but there are other operations that requires rtt as well.
>
> There are several rules binding this rtt - data-out dialog, specifically
> There can be at most outstanding bMaxNumOfRTT such packets. This might
> have an effect on write performance (sequential write in particular), as
> each data-out upiu must wait for its rtt sibling.
>
> UFSHCI expects bMaxNumOfRTT to be min(bDeviceRTTCap, NORTT). However,
> as of today, there does not appears to be no-one who sets it: not the
> host controller nor the driver. It wasn't an issue up to now:
> bMaxNumOfRTT is set to 2 after manufacturing, and wasn't limiting the
> write performance.
>
> UFS4.0, and specifically gear 5 changes this, and requires the device to
> be more attentive. This doesn't come free - the device has to allocate
> more resources to that end, but the sequential write performance
> improvement is significant. Early measurements shows 25% gain when
> moving from rtt 2 to 9. Therefore, set bMaxNumOfRTT to be
> min(bDeviceRTTCap, NORTT) as UFSHCI expects.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-26 8:16 [PATCH v6 0/3] " Avri Altman
2024-05-26 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] " Avri Altman
2024-05-29 20:03 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-05-29 21:15 ` Avri Altman
2024-05-26 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] scsi: ufs: Maximum RTT supported by the host driver Avri Altman
2024-05-28 10:02 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-05-29 20:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-05-29 21:07 ` Avri Altman
2024-05-26 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] scsi: ufs: sysfs: Make max_number_of_rtt read-write Avri Altman
2024-05-29 20:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-05-29 21:12 ` Avri Altman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c066dfb-b84b-49fc-94da-806b71e261d1@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®