From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <Oleksandr_Tyshchenko@epam.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen/pvcalls: don't call bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler() under lock
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 15:36:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c0b195d-181e-f34c-6b42-7d7e75da901c@epam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230403092711.15285-1-jgross@suse.com>
On 03.04.23 12:27, Juergen Gross wrote:
Hello Juergen
> bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler() shouldn't be called under spinlock, as it
> can sleep.
>
> This requires to move the calls of create_active() out of the locked
> regions. This is no problem, as the worst which could happen would be
> a spurious call of the interrupt handler, causing a spurious wake_up().
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y*JUIl64UDmdkboh@kadam/__;Kw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!wTyU032PQPxqlpIfuWRwb-DYE1K8P0bRWJyJICa7IEbAwQ0_aeZwknAWwxJ_cv_tWGY42f5NPgn6JHtZsiGP$ [lore[.]kernel[.]org]
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> ---
> V2:
> - remove stale spin_unlock() (Oleksandr Tyshchenko)
Reviewed-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
> ---
> drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> index d5d589bda243..b72ee9379d77 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> @@ -227,22 +227,30 @@ static irqreturn_t pvcalls_front_event_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>
> static void free_active_ring(struct sock_mapping *map);
>
> -static void pvcalls_front_free_map(struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata,
> - struct sock_mapping *map)
> +static void pvcalls_front_destroy_active(struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata,
> + struct sock_mapping *map)
> {
> int i;
>
> unbind_from_irqhandler(map->active.irq, map);
>
> - spin_lock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> - if (!list_empty(&map->list))
> - list_del_init(&map->list);
> - spin_unlock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + if (bedata) {
> + spin_lock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + if (!list_empty(&map->list))
> + list_del_init(&map->list);
> + spin_unlock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + }
>
> for (i = 0; i < (1 << PVCALLS_RING_ORDER); i++)
> gnttab_end_foreign_access(map->active.ring->ref[i], NULL);
> gnttab_end_foreign_access(map->active.ref, NULL);
> free_active_ring(map);
> +}
> +
> +static void pvcalls_front_free_map(struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata,
> + struct sock_mapping *map)
> +{
> + pvcalls_front_destroy_active(bedata, map);
>
> kfree(map);
> }
> @@ -433,19 +441,18 @@ int pvcalls_front_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
> pvcalls_exit_sock(sock);
> return ret;
> }
> -
> - spin_lock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> - ret = get_request(bedata, &req_id);
> + ret = create_active(map, &evtchn);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - spin_unlock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> free_active_ring(map);
> pvcalls_exit_sock(sock);
> return ret;
> }
> - ret = create_active(map, &evtchn);
> +
> + spin_lock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + ret = get_request(bedata, &req_id);
> if (ret < 0) {
> spin_unlock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> - free_active_ring(map);
> + pvcalls_front_destroy_active(NULL, map);
> pvcalls_exit_sock(sock);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -821,28 +828,27 @@ int pvcalls_front_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags)
> pvcalls_exit_sock(sock);
> return ret;
> }
> - spin_lock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> - ret = get_request(bedata, &req_id);
> + ret = create_active(map2, &evtchn);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - clear_bit(PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT,
> - (void *)&map->passive.flags);
> - spin_unlock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> free_active_ring(map2);
> kfree(map2);
> + clear_bit(PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT,
> + (void *)&map->passive.flags);
> pvcalls_exit_sock(sock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = create_active(map2, &evtchn);
> + spin_lock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + ret = get_request(bedata, &req_id);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - free_active_ring(map2);
> - kfree(map2);
> clear_bit(PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT,
> (void *)&map->passive.flags);
> spin_unlock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + pvcalls_front_free_map(bedata, map2);
> pvcalls_exit_sock(sock);
> return ret;
> }
> +
> list_add_tail(&map2->list, &bedata->socket_mappings);
>
> req = RING_GET_REQUEST(&bedata->ring, req_id);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-04 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-03 9:27 Juergen Gross
2023-04-04 15:36 ` Oleksandr Tyshchenko [this message]
2023-04-07 22:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c0b195d-181e-f34c-6b42-7d7e75da901c@epam.com \
--to=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®