From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751973AbdBBXpu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:45:50 -0500
Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:5620 "EHLO mga05.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751512AbdBBXps (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:45:48 -0500
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,326,1477983600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="54897822"
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests, x86, protection_keys: fix unused variable
 compile warnings
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20170202232842.C3C30DB2@viggo.jf.intel.com>
 <20170202232844.BFD31FAD@viggo.jf.intel.com>
 <0262a979-6051-7007-f119-f45ede9449b7@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <9c1b1172-ade9-b8c3-c7dc-5dc818504622@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:45:47 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0262a979-6051-7007-f119-f45ede9449b7@osg.samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 02/02/2017 03:36 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> This patches is already in linux-kselftest next for 4.11
> 
> Is there a reason why you chose to resend these.

Oh, my apologies!  I didn't realize it had been picked up elsewhere.
Ingo had mentioned a few times in the last few days that he'd noticed
the warnings.

So, x86 maintainers, do we want these to go through the kselftest tree
or the x86 tree?