From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754550AbdEDEOp (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2017 00:14:45 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:34195 "EHLO mail-pf0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752650AbdEDEOm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2017 00:14:42 -0400 Subject: Re: net/ipv6: GPF in rt6_device_match To: Cong Wang References: <4ef76406-8e05-ccdf-fefb-dc47d56c71c9@gmail.com> <79157b41-2a13-6fda-ef31-c96f16850254@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , netdev , LKML , Dmitry Vyukov , Kostya Serebryany , Eric Dumazet , syzkaller From: David Ahern Message-ID: <9c4ee119-caa7-2d50-b5f9-d94d3b63ca69@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 22:14:38 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/3/17 9:55 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > Why not add a printk and play with my patch to see the difference? I have other things to do. If you believe your patch fixes the problem, send it and let Andrey verify.