From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
antony.antony@secunet.com, steffen.klassert@secunet.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dust.li@linux.alibaba.com,
jakub@cloudflare.com, fred.cc@alibaba-inc.com,
yubing.qiuyubing@alibaba-inc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 3/3] ipv4/udp: Add 4-tuple hash for connected socket
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:19:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c636d54-4276-4e28-abd3-0860bc738640@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241012012918.70888-4-lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
On 10/12/24 03:29, Philo Lu wrote:
> Currently, the udp_table has two hash table, the port hash and portaddr
> hash. Usually for UDP servers, all sockets have the same local port and
> addr, so they are all on the same hash slot within a reuseport group.
>
> In some applications, UDP servers use connect() to manage clients. In
> particular, when firstly receiving from an unseen 4 tuple, a new socket
> is created and connect()ed to the remote addr:port, and then the fd is
> used exclusively by the client.
How do you handle the following somewhat racing scenario? a 2nd packet
beloning to the same 4-tulpe lands into the unconnected socket receive
queue just after the 1st one, before the connected socket is created.
The server process such packet after the connected socket creation.
How many connected sockets is your system serving concurrently? Possibly
it would make sense to allocate a larger hash table for the connected
UDP sockets, using separate/different min/max/scale values WRT to the
unconnected tables.
Cheers,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-14 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 1:29 [PATCH v4 net-next 0/3] udp: Add 4-tuple hash for connected sockets Philo Lu
2024-10-12 1:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 1/3] net/udp: Add a new struct for hash2 slot Philo Lu
2024-10-12 1:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 2/3] net/udp: Add 4-tuple hash list basis Philo Lu
2024-10-14 10:07 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-10-16 6:30 ` Philo Lu
2024-10-16 7:45 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-10-16 8:47 ` Philo Lu
2024-10-17 7:46 ` Philo Lu
2024-10-12 1:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 3/3] ipv4/udp: Add 4-tuple hash for connected socket Philo Lu
2024-10-14 10:19 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2024-10-16 7:28 ` Philo Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c636d54-4276-4e28-abd3-0860bc738640@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=antony.antony@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fred.cc@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yubing.qiuyubing@alibaba-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®