From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: andersson@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Use GIC-ITS for PCIe0 and PCIe1
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:15:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c7cb68c-6516-6087-92ad-e707d8b122ed@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221223174555.GE4587@thinkpad>
On 23/12/2022 19:45, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 07:18:32PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 22/12/2022 15:31, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> Both PCIe0 and PCIe1 controllers are capable of receiving MSIs from
>>> endpoint devices using GIC-ITS MSI controller. Add support for it.
>>>
>>> Currently, BDF (0:0.0) and BDF (1:0.0) are enabled and with the
>>> msi-map-mask of 0xff00, all the 32 devices under these two busses can
>>> share the same Device ID.
>>>
>>> The GIC-ITS MSI implementation provides an advantage over internal MSI
>>> implementation using Locality-specific Peripheral Interrupts (LPI) that
>>> would allow MSIs to be targeted for each CPU core.
>>>
>>> It should be noted that the MSIs for BDF (1:0.0) only works with Device
>>> ID of 0x5980 and 0x5a00. Hence, the IDs are swapped.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>> index 570475040d95..c4dd5838fac6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>> @@ -1733,9 +1733,13 @@ pcie0: pci@1c00000 {
>>> ranges = <0x01000000 0x0 0x60200000 0 0x60200000 0x0 0x100000>,
>>> <0x02000000 0x0 0x60300000 0 0x60300000 0x0 0x3d00000>;
>>> - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 141 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> - interrupt-names = "msi";
>>> - #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>>> + /*
>>> + * MSIs for BDF (1:0.0) only works with Device ID 0x5980.
>>> + * Hence, the IDs are swapped.
>>> + */
>>> + msi-map = <0x0 &gic_its 0x5981 0x1>,
>>> + <0x100 &gic_its 0x5980 0x1>;
>>
>> This definitely doesn't match what has been used in the downstream.
>>
>
> Yes, I do not know why the downstream Device ID doesn't work. I tried finding
> the answer within Qcom but didn't get any answer so far :/ So I just went with
> the value that works on multiple boards.
Ugh :-(
>
>> Also if I understand correctly this change would prevent us from using
>> multiple MSI interrupts for the connected device, as the last value of the
>> 0x100 mapping is 0x1, while the vendor kernel uses <0x100 &its 0x5981 0x20>.
>>
>
> Not true. The controller can still support multiple MSIs for the endpoint
> devices but the only difference is, it would use the same Device ID for all.
I see, please excuse me then. But don't we have to define multiple MSI
vectors here too?
>
> The Qcom GIC-ITS implementation could only support 32 Device IDs. By specifying
> the size of 0x20, a separate Device ID would be used for each devices of bus 1.
> But if a PCIe switch is connected and the bus count becomes > 1, then the MSI
> allocation would fail because Device IDs are exhausted.
>
> The downstream implementation just assumes that there will be only bus 1 and I
> do not want to follow that assumption.
>
> That's why I used "msi-map-mask" property of value "0xff00" here, as that will
> allow all the devices under the bus 1 to share the same Device ID. For now I
> only mapped bus 1, but extending that in the future for other busses is simple.
>
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
>> Do you know by chance, why do we differ from the vendor dtsi?
>>
>>> + msi-map-mask = <0xff00>;
>>> interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0x7>;
>>> interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &intc 0 0 0 149 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_a */
>>> <0 0 0 2 &intc 0 0 0 150 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_b */
>>> @@ -1842,9 +1846,13 @@ pcie1: pci@1c08000 {
>>> ranges = <0x01000000 0x0 0x40200000 0 0x40200000 0x0 0x100000>,
>>> <0x02000000 0x0 0x40300000 0 0x40300000 0x0 0x1fd00000>;
>>> - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 307 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> - interrupt-names = "msi";
>>> - #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>>> + /*
>>> + * MSIs for BDF (1:0.0) only works with Device ID 0x5a00.
>>> + * Hence, the IDs are swapped.
>>> + */
>>> + msi-map = <0x0 &gic_its 0x5a01 0x1>,
>>> + <0x100 &gic_its 0x5a00 0x1>;
>>> + msi-map-mask = <0xff00>;
>>> interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0x7>;
>>> interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &intc 0 0 0 434 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_a */
>>> <0 0 0 2 &intc 0 0 0 435 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_b */
>>
>> --
>> With best wishes
>> Dmitry
>>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-23 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-22 13:31 [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom: Add GIC-ITS support to SM8450 PCIe controllers Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Update maintainers Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document msi-map and msi-map-mask properties Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 19:01 ` Rob Herring
2022-12-23 14:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-30 15:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-12-22 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Use GIC-ITS for PCIe0 and PCIe1 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-23 17:18 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-23 17:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-23 18:15 ` Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2022-12-28 9:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-30 15:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c7cb68c-6516-6087-92ad-e707d8b122ed@linaro.org \
--to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®