Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/surface: Create a platform subdirectory for Microsoft Surface devices

[Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>]

On 10/8/20 3:38 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 10/8/20 2:32 PM, Maximilian Luz wrote:
>> On 10/8/20 1:44 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi Maximilian,
>>>
>>> On 10/5/20 6:03 PM, Maximilian Luz wrote:
>>>> As has come up in the discussion around
>>>>
>>>>    [RFC PATCH] Add support for Microsoft Surface System Aggregator Module
>>>>
>>>> it may make sense to add a Microsoft Surface specific platform
>>>> subdirectory. Andy has suggested drivers/platform/surface for that.
>>>> This series follows said suggestion and creates that subdirectory, as
>>>> well as moves Microsoft Surface related drivers over to it and updates
>>>> their MAINTAINERS entries (if available) accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> This series does not modify any existing driver code, symbols, or help
>>>> text.
>>>
>>> In case you do not know I'm taking over from any as
>>> drivers/platform/x86 maintainer.
>>>
>>> I'm fine with the concept of this series, but who is going to maintain
>>> this new drivers/platform/surface directory ?
>>>
>>> Ah I see that the first patch answers that question and the plan
>>> is to keep this part of the pdx86 maintainership.
>>>
>>> I would prefer for the new dir to have its own
>>> MAINTAINERS entry if I'm honest, I would like to try and
>>> split maintainership for the surface stuff as follows:
>>>
>>> 1. Who will review (and add their Reviewed-by or ask for improvements
>>>     or nack) patches to files in this dir?
>>>
>>> 2. Who will gather approved patches apply them to a for-next branch
>>>     and send them out to Linus during the merge Window?
>>>
>>> I can pick up 2. but I could really use some help with 1. So I
>>> was thinking having a separate MAINTAINERS entry for the new
>>> dir with you (Maximilian) (and me and Mark Gross) listed as
>>> MAINTAINERS; and then I'm hoping that you can do the review
>>> of surface related patches. At least those which you have not
>>> written yourself.
>>>
>>> How does that sound ?
>>
>> Sounds good, I'd be happy to help review and approve any Surface related
>> patches. However, I think it would be beneficial if you and Mark still
>> have a final look (and say) over the ones I've reviewed and accepted (if
>> that's not already a given). I feel like I may lack a bit of experience
>> for this job and might miss some things.
> 
> Since Mark or I will be merging the patches we will indeed still take
> a look at them, but it helps if someone else has already done a review
> first.

Perfect, thank you! I'll take on 1) then.

Regards,
Max