mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kyungmin Park" <kmpark@infradead.org>
To: "Matt Mackall" <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: "Abhishek Rai" <abhishekrai@google.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Andreas Dilger" <adilger@sun.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ken Chen" <kenchen@google.com>,
	"Mike Waychison" <mikew@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clustering indirect blocks in Ext3
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:34:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c9fda240711190234q357f2ec5v3def4601355ea23d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071118204724.GS19691@waste.org>

Hi,

> >
> > Setup: 4 cpu, 8GB RAM, 400GB disk.
> >
> > Average vanilla results
> > ==========================================================================
> > intial create total runs 30 avg 46.49 MB/s (user 1.12s sys 2.25s)
> > create total runs 5 avg 12.90 MB/s (user 1.08s sys 1.97s)
> > patch total runs 4 avg 8.70 MB/s (user 0.60s sys 2.31s)
> > compile total runs 7 avg 21.44 MB/s (user 0.32s sys 2.95s)
> > clean total runs 4 avg 59.91 MB/s (user 0.05s sys 0.26s)
> > read tree total runs 2 avg 21.85 MB/s (user 1.12s sys 2.89s)
> > read compiled tree total runs 1 avg 23.47 MB/s (user 1.45s sys 4.89s)
> > delete tree total runs 2 avg 13.18 seconds (user 0.64s sys 1.02s)
> > no runs for delete compiled tree
> > stat tree total runs 4 avg 4.76 seconds (user 0.70s sys 0.50s)
> > stat compiled tree total runs 1 avg 7.84 seconds (user 0.74s sys 0.54s)
> >
> > Average metaclustering results
> > ==========================================================================
> > intial create total runs 30 avg 45.04 MB/s (user 1.13s sys 2.42s)
> > create total runs 5 avg 15.64 MB/s (user 1.08s sys 1.98s)
> > patch total runs 4 avg 10.50 MB/s (user 0.61s sys 3.11s)
> > compile total runs 7 avg 28.07 MB/s (user 0.33s sys 4.06s)
> > clean total runs 4 avg 83.27 MB/s (user 0.04s sys 0.27s)
> > read tree total runs 2 avg 21.17 MB/s (user 1.15s sys 2.91s)
> > read compiled tree total runs 1 avg 22.79 MB/s (user 1.38s sys 4.89s)
> > delete tree total runs 2 avg 9.23 seconds (user 0.62s sys 1.01s)
> > no runs for delete compiled tree
> > stat tree total runs 4 avg 4.72 seconds (user 0.71s sys 0.50s)
> > stat compiled tree total runs 1 avg 6.50 seconds (user 0.79s sys 0.53s)
> >
> > Overall, metaclustering does better than vanilla except in a few cases.
>

I think above testcases are just run with normal I/O case.
Did you test the direct I/O test with this patch?
With metaclustering patch, I can't run 'fsstress' since it oops when direct I/O.
or is it dependent on other ext3 patches?
Since I tested it with latest kernel 2.6.24-rc3 instead of mm kernel.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-19 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-16  5:02 Abhishek Rai
2007-11-16  7:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16  7:37   ` Matt Mackall
2007-11-18 15:52     ` Abhishek Rai
2007-11-18 20:47       ` Matt Mackall
2007-11-19 10:34         ` Kyungmin Park [this message]
2007-11-20 20:25       ` John Stoffel
2007-11-16 11:28   ` Andreas Dilger
2007-11-16 21:11   ` Theodore Tso
2007-11-17  0:25     ` Abhishek Rai
2007-11-17  2:58       ` Theodore Tso
2007-11-17  8:58         ` Abhishek Rai
2007-12-21 14:15         ` Abhishek Rai
2008-01-10 21:17           ` Abhishek Rai
2008-01-11 17:05             ` Daniel Phillips
2008-01-12  0:04               ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12  6:05                 ` Daniel Phillips
2008-01-13  5:06                   ` Abhishek Rai
2007-11-16 22:27   ` Abhishek Rai
     [not found] <9q1CT-82L-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <9q3v2-2Br-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <9qgLE-7ds-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <9qjJx-3wE-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <9qm4D-70Q-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <9CQTt-7cr-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <9KcYS-46E-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-01-11 14:12             ` Bodo Eggert
2008-01-11 14:49               ` Abhishek Rai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c9fda240711190234q357f2ec5v3def4601355ea23d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kmpark@infradead.org \
    --cc=abhishekrai@google.com \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kenchen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®