mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: babu.moger@amd.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
	bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
	xingxin.hx@openanolis.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com,
	amitsinght@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/24] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare()
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 18:06:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cbbbae4-c1f5-97e1-0d29-b83827d6c70d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64a2b373-2859-4412-8858-9a99d7e646f5@amd.com>

Hi Babu,

On 04/10/2023 19:01, Moger, Babu wrote:
> On 9/14/23 12:21, James Morse wrote:
>> RMID are allocated for each monitor or control group directory, because
>> each of these needs its own RMID. For control groups,
>> rdtgroup_mkdir_ctrl_mon() later goes on to allocate the CLOSID.
>>
>> MPAM's equivalent of RMID is not an independent number, so can't be
>> allocated until the CLOSID is known. An RMID allocation for one CLOSID
>> may fail, whereas another may succeed depending on how many monitor
>> groups a control group has.
>>
>> The RMID allocation needs to move to be after the CLOSID has been
>> allocated.
>>
>> Move the RMID allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() to occur in its caller,
>> after the mkdir_rdt_prepare() call. This allows the RMID allocator to
>> know the CLOSID.

>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index 7a7369a323b5..d25cb8c9a20e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -3189,6 +3189,12 @@ static int mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_free(struct rdtgroup *rgrp)
>> +{
>> +	if (rdt_mon_capable)
>> +		free_rmid(rgrp->mon.rmid);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int mkdir_rdt_prepare(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>  			     const char *name, umode_t mode,
>>  			     enum rdt_group_type rtype, struct rdtgroup **r)
>> @@ -3254,12 +3260,6 @@ static int mkdir_rdt_prepare(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>  		goto out_destroy;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	ret = mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc(rdtgrp);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		goto out_destroy;
>> -
>> -	kernfs_activate(kn);
> 
> You should not remove "kernfs_activate(kn); from here (only the last line).
> 
> kernfs_create_dir is called in this function.
> 
> /* kernfs creates the directory for rdtgrp */
>  kn = kernfs_create_dir(parent_kn, name, mode, rdtgrp);
> 
> 
> There should be matching kernfs_activate.

I think your point is kernfs_activate() should have been called by the time
mkdir_rdt_prepare() returns because it creates other directories. I don't think this
matters because kernfs_activate() is a tree operation. Sure, the control/monitor group
directory isn't visible once mkdir_rdt_prepare() returns, but by the time either of its
two callers return, changes to the directory tree have been activated.

Moving these lines is the to ensure user-space doesn't see the control/monitor group as
existing without the mon_data directory that is created by mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc().


>> -
>>  	/*
>>  	 * The caller unlocks the parent_kn upon success.
>>  	 */
>> @@ -3278,7 +3278,6 @@ static int mkdir_rdt_prepare(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>  static void mkdir_rdt_prepare_clean(struct rdtgroup *rgrp)
>>  {
>>  	kernfs_remove(rgrp->kn);
>> -	free_rmid(rgrp->mon.rmid);
>>  	rdtgroup_remove(rgrp);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -3300,12 +3299,21 @@ static int rdtgroup_mkdir_mon(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>  	prgrp = rdtgrp->mon.parent;
>>  	rdtgrp->closid = prgrp->closid;
>>  
>> +	ret = mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc(rdtgrp);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		mkdir_rdt_prepare_clean(rdtgrp);
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	kernfs_activate(rdtgrp->kn);
> 
> I dont see the need for this. There is kernfs_activate  inside
> mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc (mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc
> ->mkdir_mondata_all)  for all the files created.

> Also mkdir_rdt_prepare already has kernfs_activate for the files it created.

It does, and this makes the mon_data directory visible in the parent control/monitor group
- but that control/monitor group isn't visible until this kernfs_activate(rdtgrp->kn)
makes it visible. The scope of these tree operations is different.

Looking at this again, there is an existing problem with the mon_groups directory not
being visible until after the control/monitor group is visible, worse is that if the
mon_group directory creation fails, the control/monitor group is removed. Chances are
no-one is depending on this.

I do think ultimately these kernfs_activate() calls should be moved to the end of the
syscall helpers that change the directory structure. This would stop things being briefly
visible.



Thanks!

James

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-05 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-14 17:21 [PATCH v6 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking James Morse
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/24] tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef James Morse
2023-09-26 14:31   ` Fenghua Yu
2023-10-03 21:05   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/24] x86/resctrl: kfree() rmid_ptrs from rdtgroup_exit() James Morse
2023-10-02 17:00   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-05 17:05     ` James Morse
2023-10-05 18:04       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-25 17:56         ` James Morse
2023-10-04 18:00   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-05 17:06     ` James Morse
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/24] x86/resctrl: Create helper for RMID allocation and mondata dir creation James Morse
2023-10-03 21:07   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/24] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() James Morse
2023-10-03 21:07   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-04 18:01   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-05 17:06     ` James Morse [this message]
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/24] x86/resctrl: Track the closid with the rmid James Morse
2023-10-03 21:11   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/24] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index James Morse
2023-10-03 21:12   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-24  9:28   ` Maciej Wieczór-Retman
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/24] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID James Morse
2023-10-03 21:12   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/24] x86/resctrl: Track the number of dirty RMID a CLOSID has James Morse
2023-10-03 21:13   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-05 17:07     ` James Morse
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/24] x86/resctrl: Use set_bit()/clear_bit() instead of open coding James Morse
2023-09-17 21:00   ` David Laight
2023-09-29 16:13     ` James Morse
2023-10-03 21:14   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-04 20:38   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-05 17:07     ` James Morse
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/24] x86/resctrl: Allocate the cleanest CLOSID by searching closid_num_dirty_rmid James Morse
2023-10-03 21:14   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-05 20:13   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 17:56     ` James Morse
2023-10-05 20:26   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 17:56     ` James Morse
2023-10-24 12:06   ` Maciej Wieczór-Retman
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 11/24] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers James Morse
2023-10-03 21:15   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 12/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpumask_any_housekeeping() for limbo/overflow James Morse
2023-10-03 21:15   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-05 17:07     ` James Morse
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 13/24] x86/resctrl: Queue mon_event_read() instead of sending an IPI James Morse
2023-10-03 21:17   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-25 17:56     ` James Morse
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 14/24] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep James Morse
2023-10-03 21:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-25 17:57     ` James Morse
2023-10-05 21:33   ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 15/24] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2023-10-03 21:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-05 21:46   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 17:58     ` James Morse
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 16/24] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_mounted checks explicit James Morse
2023-10-03 21:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 17/24] x86/resctrl: Move alloc/mon static keys into helpers James Morse
2023-10-03 21:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 18/24] x86/resctrl: Make rdt_enable_key the arch's decision to switch James Morse
2023-10-03 21:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 19/24] x86/resctrl: Add helpers for system wide mon/alloc capable James Morse
2023-10-03 21:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 20/24] x86/resctrl: Add CPU online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-10-03 21:20   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 21/24] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu James Morse
2023-10-03 21:22   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-25 17:57     ` James Morse
2023-10-27 21:20       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 22/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpu offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-10-03 21:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-25 17:57     ` James Morse
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 23/24] x86/resctrl: Move domain helper migration into resctrl_offline_cpu() James Morse
2023-10-03 21:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-14 17:21 ` [PATCH v6 24/24] x86/resctrl: Separate arch and fs resctrl locks James Morse
2023-10-03 21:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-25 17:55     ` James Morse
2023-09-27  7:38 ` [PATCH v6 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-09-29 16:13   ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9cbbbae4-c1f5-97e1-0d29-b83827d6c70d@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=amitsinght@marvell.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=xingxin.hx@openanolis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®