From: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
To: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc: replace costly bailout check in sysvipc_find_ipc()
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 21:40:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cc4f4f1a8bcecf5dcb72c4d0aff9e70@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210809203554.1562989-1-aquini@redhat.com>
On 2021-08-09 13:35, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> sysvipc_find_ipc() was left with a costly way to check if the offset
> position fed to it is bigger than the total number of IPC IDs in use.
> So much so that the time it takes to iterate over /proc/sysvipc/* files
> grows exponentially for a custom benchmark that creates "N" SYSV shm
> segments and then times the read of /proc/sysvipc/shm (milliseconds):
>
> 12 msecs to read 1024 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 18 msecs to read 2048 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 65 msecs to read 4096 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 325 msecs to read 8192 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 1303 msecs to read 16384 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 5182 msecs to read 32768 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
>
> The root problem lies with the loop that computes the total amount of
> ids
> in use to check if the "pos" feeded to sysvipc_find_ipc() grew bigger
> than
> "ids->in_use". That is a quite inneficient way to get to the maximum
> index
> in the id lookup table, specially when that value is already provided
> by
> struct ipc_ids.max_idx.
>
> This patch follows up on the optimization introduced via commit
> 15df03c879836
> ("sysvipc: make get_maxid O(1) again") and gets rid of the
> aforementioned
> costly loop replacing it by a simpler checkpoint based on
> ipc_get_maxidx()
> returned value, which allows for a smooth linear increase in time
> complexity
> for the same custom benchmark:
>
> 2 msecs to read 1024 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 2 msecs to read 2048 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 4 msecs to read 4096 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 9 msecs to read 8192 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 19 msecs to read 16384 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
> 39 msecs to read 32768 segs from /proc/sysvipc/shm
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-10 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-09 20:35 Rafael Aquini
2021-08-10 1:48 ` Waiman Long
2021-08-10 4:40 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2021-08-17 18:34 ` Manfred Spraul
2021-08-20 19:41 ` Manfred Spraul
2021-08-25 22:15 ` Rafael Aquini
2021-08-27 2:17 ` Rafael Aquini
2021-08-28 16:35 ` Manfred Spraul
2022-09-02 13:59 Request to cherry-pick 20401d1058f3f841f35a594ac2fc1293710e55b9 to v5.10 and v5.4 Varsha Teratipally
2022-09-02 13:59 ` [PATCH] ipc: replace costly bailout check in sysvipc_find_ipc() Varsha Teratipally
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9cc4f4f1a8bcecf5dcb72c4d0aff9e70@suse.de \
--to=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome