On 4/28/05, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:55:48PM +0900, aq wrote: > > hello, > > > > At the moment, the configuration interface of Filesystem is not very consistent: > > > > - All other filesystem configurations (like Reiserfs, JFS, ext3,...) > > is in fs/Kconfig, but only XFS is in a separate file fs/xfs/Kconfig > > - All other filesystem configuration is processed in the same screen > > (using a kind of drop-down interface), but XFS configuration is done > > in a separate screen. > > > > Here is the patch to fix the problem: it moves XFS configuration from > > fs/xfs/Kconfig to fs/Kconfig, makes it to do all the configuration in > > the same screen (by removing "menu" directive), and removes the > > unnecessary fs/xfs/Kconfig. > > The screen bits is fine, btu please keep fs/xfs/Kconfig. It make maintaince > a lot a easier for us XFS people. > > I dont see why we should keep a file in kernel tree without using it (since the patch removes "source xfs/Kconfig). Anyway, here is another patch that doesnt remove fs/xfs/Kconfig. Also note that this patch (and the last one, too) moves "config XFS_EXPOR" to the bottom, so the menu intems aligns better and consistently with others (like what Reiserfs, JFS,... are doing) Andrew, please pick one of these two. Thank you. # diffstat makefile.fs2.patch Kconfig | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Signed-off-by: Nguyen Anh Quynh \