From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263620AbTLXNom (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 24 Dec 2003 08:44:42 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263622AbTLXNom
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 24 Dec 2003 08:44:42 -0500
Received: from rogue.ncsl.nist.gov ([129.6.101.41]:60336 "EHLO
	rogue.ncsl.nist.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263620AbTLXNol
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 24 Dec 2003 08:44:41 -0500
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DevFS vs. udev
References: <E1AYl4w-0007A5-R3@O.Q.NET>
	<20031224151314.700680fe.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
	<1072240684.2947.184.camel@duergar> <1072264524.3555.4.camel@nomade>
From: Ian Soboroff <ian.soboroff@nist.gov>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 08:44:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1072264524.3555.4.camel@nomade> (Xavier Bestel's message of
 "Wed, 24 Dec 2003 12:15:25 +0100")
Message-ID: <9cf8yl2e3ej.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr> writes:

> I have to admit that devfs is the best, hands down, at a crucial lkml
> exercise: the flamefest. It seems even after it'll die, it will continue
> to attract devotees and flames.

Perhaps the devfs devotees will maintain their code in BK, and we can
merge two perennial lkml flamewars into one.

Ian