Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the nolibc tree

[Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>]

On 8/17/23 10:30, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2023-08-17 13:38:11+1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> The following commit is also in the vfs-brauner tree as a different commit
>> (but the same patch):
>>
>>    ba859b2e419c ("selftests/nolibc: drop test chmod_net")
>>
>> This is commit
>>
>>    49319832de90 ("selftests/nolibc: drop test chmod_net")
>>
>> in the vfs-brauner tree.
> 
> I think we can drop the patch from the nolibc tree.
> The patch is only really necessary in combination with
> commit 18e66ae67673 ("proc: use generic setattr() for /proc/$PID/net")
> which already is and should stay in the vfs tree.

Thomas,

Do the rest of the nolibc patches build without this if we were
to drop this patch? Dorpping requires rebase and please see below.

Willy, Paul,

How do we want to handle this so we can avoid rebasing to keep
the Commit IDs the same as one ones in Willy's nolibc branch?

I would recommend dropping this commit from vfs-brauner if it
doesn't cause problems.

thanks,
-- Shuah