From: Ian Soboroff <ian.soboroff@nist.gov>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Post-halloween doc updates.
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:06:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cfd6cdla4o.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031030141519.GA10700@redhat.com> (Dave Jones's message of "Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:15:19 +0000")
And APM suspend seems to have broken in -test8. Does it work for
anyone?
Ian
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> writes:
> Power management.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> - 2.6 contains a more up to date snapshot of the ACPI driver. Should
> you experience any problems booting, try booting with the argument
> "acpi=off" to rule out any ACPI interaction. ACPI has a much more involved
> role in bringing the system up in 2.6 than it did in 2.4
> - The old "acpismp=force" boot option is now obsolete, and will be ignored
> due to the old "mini ACPI" parser being removed.
> - software suspend is still in development, and in need of more work.
> Use with SMP and/or PREEMPT not advised.
> - The ACPI code will do basic sanity checks on the DMI structure in the BIOS
> to determine the date it was written. BIOSes older than year 2000 are
> assumed to be broken. In some circumstances, this assumption is wrong.
> If you see a message saying ACPI is disabled for this reason, try booting
> with acpi=force. If things work fine, send the output of dmidecode
> (http://www.nongnu.org/dmidecode/) to acpi-devel@lists.sf.net
> with an explanation of why your BIOS shouldn't be blacklisted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-31 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-30 14:15 Dave Jones
2003-10-30 15:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-30 15:18 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-30 16:55 ` John Bradford
2003-10-30 15:15 ` Holger Schurig
2003-10-30 15:19 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-30 16:52 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-30 17:27 ` Chris Wright
2003-10-30 18:38 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-30 18:44 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-30 18:53 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-30 17:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-10-30 19:08 ` Philipp Matthias Hahn
2003-10-30 22:16 ` bd
2003-10-31 1:32 ` Gene Heskett
2003-10-31 12:50 ` Thierry Vignaud
2003-10-30 23:11 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-10-31 0:16 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-31 2:14 ` John Levon
2003-10-31 2:30 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-31 7:34 ` ide-scsi is working [was: Post-halloween doc updates.] Nuno Silva
2003-10-31 13:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-10-31 12:25 ` Post-halloween doc updates Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-10-31 15:35 ` Paul Dickson
2003-10-31 15:06 ` Ian Soboroff [this message]
2003-10-31 15:24 ` Russell King
2003-10-31 16:00 ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
2003-10-31 16:03 ` Ian Soboroff
2003-10-31 16:14 ` Russell King
2003-10-31 17:56 ` Michael Clark
2003-11-10 23:43 ` bill davidsen
2003-11-11 1:09 ` Rob Landley
2003-11-10 14:11 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-31 15:53 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-10-31 23:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2003-11-01 7:44 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9cfd6cdla4o.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov \
--to=ian.soboroff@nist.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome