From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fw2.prolan.hu (fw2.prolan.hu [193.68.50.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9536F29672F; Thu, 15 May 2025 09:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.68.50.107 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747301222; cv=none; b=fWzXWIWHU02EBmh9b26xDbfCce6WnxZpdDe9ttmV77hmAQ1ozCkcGoB/AaNIPs6JZWxiHKeyc2TNKl4IVB+7zhCQkCb/Q6q3HD+niJru0WxsBAjMLVdKGya5m0EQu9Sn2YGBlb5iNjNb+RQC56sLiiuwBQhKZkREXkGjdUmVqV4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747301222; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S6zEEqZ7XzVr8Ft6SXafxnt9X1JbkToWYQSIGNNYSq0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=TJ9vcCBGgGa4wQHj6e2GN/F9XpyPXVsf7xvXYseGam5WkkgeztN166/tZvVvdAAAhhukePaDLiKNStsckL8DJdt1MGrLZj3XV/MfRJyAX2w2B2Gshxdb3kPhigsb9s3Xe1mHJ5E7iyrDkH+yu1xowCUWDtzwWAeg7nz2Uaub9Ng= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=prolan.hu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=prolan.hu; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=prolan.hu header.i=@prolan.hu header.b=pLkczEHj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.68.50.107 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=prolan.hu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=prolan.hu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=prolan.hu header.i=@prolan.hu header.b="pLkczEHj" Received: from proxmox-mailgw.intranet.prolan.hu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-mailgw.intranet.prolan.hu (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 780BCA0149; Thu, 15 May 2025 11:26:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=prolan.hu; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mail; bh=ubCfZqnUCO4PP/bK7tVa PooeXZwMddulOK5iV2CA9+w=; b=pLkczEHjHfzoDsoFPgNwkuAKJL+9PunTHLhx tgUiuREirMWir6ZXaPHUPerKZST1XdJLonM2kdiuvzyaREXhUSl+whgNGA7C6crB S6F5iFaPVvnU+2TEfYpgbXYmh38WdDpKb7JxweaJusQ35Mi2dIwU7ibb3uI0J+KR k4mfqfl4q18OzECYimwK9zWgRTWQYruap8fcRYnhyO7aUKtiCPIUrD+oRyenU8+K n/CcICixGzzaz9Gdfejusx/JrcjyIEYvd1HVCoHUpvrRSDa5mJsadMWogpO3Zlbk 2f8ZrDGnz8riHlG86Prpd/Um0+xe+eS+i2R1xYNsUAwHuEoWSi9Y2LlJfJ5I6nZ3 a7b0helHriLNUldNahETbvZCgCfLNJJMSsHaLRleW8n2yK7WrUHD3LEXsMkKDA/N bmGq/Pr1XRDQSUI/sVlex1QhfLsbMLqJ3RFNjq28WbELXB7isS9RgLVgxrY83Ks+ vEK4cUYgOKK59B4jNHN5dzzOrePbCjGp+APfAl6TVBk4SEj+qYJWuAqtSG0Vo6vI Gs9XmmzC2sae83NjO8VwEsjfimmavGYdZkmChEfwYSCGVxaQEyRNO1ZFXFW2qlo0 hNbvndPXTXVflP4bsDVXcaLuz5pnWkIYLPSuR9NFgBx3cU/sPOJQv6wtOL7UROuK U6YQat8= Message-ID: <9d384301-3f73-4120-a82b-580eb5f1a4ed@prolan.hu> Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 11:26:57 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add `devm_dma_request_chan()` to simplify probe path in atmel-quadspi.c To: Mark Brown CC: , , , , "Vinod Koul" , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Tudor Ambarus" References: <20250515083132.255410-1-csokas.bence@prolan.hu> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?B?Q3PDs2vDoXMgQmVuY2U=?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: sinope.intranet.prolan.hu (10.254.0.237) To ATLAS.intranet.prolan.hu (10.254.0.229) X-EsetResult: clean, is OK X-EsetId: 37303A296767155D617062 Hi, On 2025. 05. 15. 11:22, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Csókás Bence wrote: >> On 2025. 05. 15. 10:45, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> I can't tell what the plan is here, or what the status is for the first >>> patch (since I'm not CCed). The second patch depends on a new API >>> introduced in the first patch so it can't be merged independently. > >> Yes, the situation is a bit convoluted. Obviously 2/2 will be applied after >> 1/2, in a similar vein than the former PM series. > >> So what I was trying to say: Vinod should be able to apply 1/2 to his branch >> (dma/next) right now, which can then be merged to spi/for-next. This merged >> branch should be able to then cleanly apply 2/2. > > I wouldn't expect to pull the whole DMA tree in, that'll have a huge > amount of extra stuff in it - if I was going to pull something I'd > expect a topic branch. Fair point. > Wouldn't it be simpler for me to just apply both > patches at this point if there's no conflicts with the DMA tree? We're > at -rc6 now... That also works for me. I should send 1/2 to you as well, correct? Bence