From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (mail-wr1-f49.google.com [209.85.221.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0A11DD877 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 08:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756889290; cv=none; b=lgnsewrEb3qUoIm5Fn6jVjsZyUt+2/L3VXtkVlB9cmVbOqIkR00yYmiSXhnG01U8l1DZddwYZ3ByH6mi6eTpcMQirYunPHKsrYOZIBXbFWXvIDcLMZzeWCeiR66iZvUPbXzqS94B4BEbk6EMwmrAs9/ADeqQuVI3WdNahRhH7/M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756889290; c=relaxed/simple; bh=G/HQAICVyosrIp4ApXauWvFtOuVnGI7B86rhG1fg2Xo=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=si/iaoTE8ebvZEFV82QzBJqQFmdAencqxaPmVaUEnfgmE7e/wAaufBSyQjSbLFQIHShxTYlzUPfeQeJGlta0B/sIPyYaWJv/AVzi3oEfdEDNoPL4+thgKuvOkhJnP1fKByYgCBVjJbc/qW4fQMqI/p72Ppt+V/tOawaWmzcJOyo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=V47aNZD6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="V47aNZD6" Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3d2564399a5so1422485f8f.1 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 01:48:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1756889287; x=1757494087; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7+dFhyhyqJr75WwSaOHE7BII74yZAHk+nCpXZ3qcIN8=; b=V47aNZD6+myt7DbmGWumvxzyD+cLIcqxll0B65u4OQjbimxzstF2xnFKAeVIhgIhQB d2YFdES5eVT9+MXuZXqsU59EvYDJXfamY3CMUzo4xFtaYAQWz+HX/urF+HBeQAZqhuCx 4wVnsOIB9Ah32PisqILE+KmpeM3bS5mqR/pXUO7loShsTKTnJRjJpGeELRZ8oCpgY00h +RpBwYYc3H5xQAuV/DYdcuqDnoObkpZfzkEtf5sdDPLlqrqjylSuEf8pFSKsmeKEABVc 1QiuSfS/4UlLesV7q4HXWwhPHfa9z7DOf43kEZYzxrIZk+zd5z0dOGAtEsBcuyCiHtSk HDWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1756889287; x=1757494087; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=7+dFhyhyqJr75WwSaOHE7BII74yZAHk+nCpXZ3qcIN8=; b=l6z4ChIkRZZfx5M2vBa/0m005DZs/xMtcwiEZlZ9WVg7dnkrjDE2OPsW5tv8Js8V00 qk1dKcWiLyRTkovvX5+HECL1LJKgFo5SDZmpJeEfoaS8Yn7hbmbD8H6eAph6br//tele gzvLN0mkuZWLt2XRXTnVcpqlTQCbQhb2MyGqf4ZMz/VzoEl/tEQYdR+4rSB4smxezWFB 1nNnEOmIvplMm2Q07IZM9K8aH1g0wNh8b2E0siPS6qSM2XA3r1UZ2IljXGuM+tMGpxzC lsBMBDQnM3EC78hR6EWL5fdid6yJflvEwq62PW3aIjgMCFOnQZrtze7rlMlPT0rigo/Y ej+g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUD+tAET8mCLTYuwGx19pMT28P2ZkPIvrrrPWmkn7aMfvQNsMAuoAYp5S/u8lZzwogV2kTUCR5MHYEBZMg=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxF3AmO232H8N5mid2Q1RsheA0HaTDCXz1W89ab4wdh75r6TE8N kjbhdpydYnd7On2D01Huj92ryw7fMp2bwI2dRBoQLGShOHh3lDiBVjcy/Q2yxPwI/z4= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncubcIhY+wCp/DQQct0ZcIam2fAif1rBrlszlVTW1lzs2IN3KwVVS9/Dh5EGUC9 Ydsja79QLlnv7IHjEGpl2lwMtxf6MebVX2O+4eWH+ySaQRKJnbFtvzpFRpxCdqxhX97ovyfPYzx qqAhyHB9QM0XBhDvT+VTC77jZ+Jy2j9v9YBIsgdkBwbg8/e+F1eJrGhNRwGYiookfdHtmcjc5sy 7yeZ0IGn/i1NzUEnoJGygAeubJBQC4wjIaNPPYNgn1Gq9AJVIJUj5mPWfRMCzUmqy/zXtr8WIr2 LAwpKRVUgRwMMMMpTYcC2J4SGPpz96vEeDpQXOz44yKU4rCc/hfi1yHZZJfMYnWaQLwocN1rmkV FAu6VsIYEc4Z5ceMLfxj/e1idOS2jSuCE7rmhxTQzuzO5isuFePL8stJ4EPSWWg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHbXlAmsIr5mQsBVFTxh9EzMGiTHl5fiPrZ9WFCdZ67HAZOog5Phq9OBFDDnIrmcC3cSLTumg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:288b:b0:3cd:2328:898b with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3d1e05b5c25mr10817288f8f.47.1756889286519; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 01:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2403:580d:fda1::299? (2403-580d-fda1--299.ip6.aussiebb.net. [2403:580d:fda1::299]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-249067de9f1sm153203545ad.151.2025.09.03.01.48.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2025 01:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9d6db7e9-318f-4242-9883-9eee8ee20f5e@suse.com> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 18:18:01 +0930 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [linus:master] [btrfs] bddf57a707: stress-ng.sync-file.ops_per_sec 44.2% regression To: kernel test robot Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <202509031643.303d114c-lkp@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Qu Wenruo Autocrypt: addr=wqu@suse.com; keydata= xsBNBFnVga8BCACyhFP3ExcTIuB73jDIBA/vSoYcTyysFQzPvez64TUSCv1SgXEByR7fju3o 8RfaWuHCnkkea5luuTZMqfgTXrun2dqNVYDNOV6RIVrc4YuG20yhC1epnV55fJCThqij0MRL 1NxPKXIlEdHvN0Kov3CtWA+R1iNN0RCeVun7rmOrrjBK573aWC5sgP7YsBOLK79H3tmUtz6b 9Imuj0ZyEsa76Xg9PX9Hn2myKj1hfWGS+5og9Va4hrwQC8ipjXik6NKR5GDV+hOZkktU81G5 gkQtGB9jOAYRs86QG/b7PtIlbd3+pppT0gaS+wvwMs8cuNG+Pu6KO1oC4jgdseFLu7NpABEB AAHNGFF1IFdlbnJ1byA8d3F1QHN1c2UuY29tPsLAlAQTAQgAPgIbAwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIE FgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBC3fcuWlpVuonapC4cI9kfOhJf6oBQJnEXVgBQkQ/lqxAAoJEMI9kfOh Jf6o+jIH/2KhFmyOw4XWAYbnnijuYqb/obGae8HhcJO2KIGcxbsinK+KQFTSZnkFxnbsQ+VY fvtWBHGt8WfHcNmfjdejmy9si2jyy8smQV2jiB60a8iqQXGmsrkuR+AM2V360oEbMF3gVvim 2VSX2IiW9KERuhifjseNV1HLk0SHw5NnXiWh1THTqtvFFY+CwnLN2GqiMaSLF6gATW05/sEd V17MdI1z4+WSk7D57FlLjp50F3ow2WJtXwG8yG8d6S40dytZpH9iFuk12Sbg7lrtQxPPOIEU rpmZLfCNJJoZj603613w/M8EiZw6MohzikTWcFc55RLYJPBWQ+9puZtx1DopW2jOwE0EWdWB rwEIAKpT62HgSzL9zwGe+WIUCMB+nOEjXAfvoUPUwk+YCEDcOdfkkM5FyBoJs8TCEuPXGXBO Cl5P5B8OYYnkHkGWutAVlUTV8KESOIm/KJIA7jJA+Ss9VhMjtePfgWexw+P8itFRSRrrwyUf E+0WcAevblUi45LjWWZgpg3A80tHP0iToOZ5MbdYk7YFBE29cDSleskfV80ZKxFv6koQocq0 vXzTfHvXNDELAuH7Ms/WJcdUzmPyBf3Oq6mKBBH8J6XZc9LjjNZwNbyvsHSrV5bgmu/THX2n g/3be+iqf6OggCiy3I1NSMJ5KtR0q2H2Nx2Vqb1fYPOID8McMV9Ll6rh8S8AEQEAAcLAfAQY AQgAJgIbDBYhBC3fcuWlpVuonapC4cI9kfOhJf6oBQJnEXWBBQkQ/lrSAAoJEMI9kfOhJf6o cakH+QHwDszsoYvmrNq36MFGgvAHRjdlrHRBa4A1V1kzd4kOUokongcrOOgHY9yfglcvZqlJ qfa4l+1oxs1BvCi29psteQTtw+memmcGruKi+YHD7793zNCMtAtYidDmQ2pWaLfqSaryjlzR /3tBWMyvIeWZKURnZbBzWRREB7iWxEbZ014B3gICqZPDRwwitHpH8Om3eZr7ygZck6bBa4MU o1XgbZcspyCGqu1xF/bMAY2iCDcq6ULKQceuKkbeQ8qxvt9hVxJC2W3lHq8dlK1pkHPDg9wO JoAXek8MF37R8gpLoGWl41FIUb3hFiu3zhDDvslYM4BmzI18QgQTQnotJH8= In-Reply-To: <202509031643.303d114c-lkp@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 在 2025/9/3 18:14, kernel test robot 写道: > > Hello, > > kernel test robot noticed a 44.2% regression of stress-ng.sync-file.ops_per_sec on: > > > commit: bddf57a70781ef8821d415200bdbcb71f443993a ("btrfs: delay btrfs_open_devices() until super block is created") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > [still regression on linus/master fb679c832b6497f19fffb8274c419783909c0912] > [still regression on linux-next/master 3cace99d63192a7250461b058279a42d91075d0c] > > testcase: stress-ng > config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 > compiler: gcc-12 > test machine: 64 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6346 CPU @ 3.10GHz (Ice Lake) with 256G memory > parameters: > > nr_threads: 100% > disk: 1HDD > testtime: 60s > fs: btrfs > test: sync-file > cpufreq_governor: performance > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202509031643.303d114c-lkp@intel.com > > > Details are as below: > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > > > The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250903/202509031643.303d114c-lkp@intel.com > > ========================================================================================= > compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/testtime: > gcc-12/performance/1HDD/btrfs/x86_64-rhel-9.4/100%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-icl-2sp8/sync-file/stress-ng/60s > > commit: > de339cbfb4 ("btrfs: call bdev_fput() to reclaim the blk_holder immediately") > bddf57a707 ("btrfs: delay btrfs_open_devices() until super block is created") This doesn't sound sane to me. The two commits are only affecting btrfs mounting/unmounting, I can not make any sense on why they would affect performance. Or does stress-ng doing a lot of mounting/unmounting? Thanks, Qu > > de339cbfb4027957 bddf57a70781ef8821d415200bd > ---------------- --------------------------- > %stddev %change %stddev > \ | \ > 1885182 ± 2% -35.0% 1226241 cpuidle..usage > 1.35 ± 3% +26.8% 1.71 ± 31% iostat.cpu.iowait > 114330 -10.0% 102922 meminfo.Shmem > 17680 ± 2% -39.7% 10656 ± 2% vmstat.system.cs > 32084 ± 3% -33.6% 21290 ± 2% vmstat.system.in > 0.08 ± 2% -0.0 0.05 ± 2% mpstat.cpu.all.irq% > 0.03 ± 6% -0.0 0.02 ± 5% mpstat.cpu.all.soft% > 0.66 ± 3% -0.2 0.45 ± 2% mpstat.cpu.all.sys% > 311692 ± 9% -17.9% 255869 ± 12% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit > 304181 ± 8% -24.2% 230456 ± 20% numa-numastat.node1.local_node > 331109 ± 6% -19.3% 267048 ± 11% numa-numastat.node1.numa_hit > 311531 ± 9% -17.9% 255766 ± 13% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit > 330584 ± 6% -19.3% 266623 ± 10% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_hit > 303656 ± 8% -24.2% 230030 ± 20% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_local > 59.00 ± 13% -41.5% 34.50 ± 10% perf-c2c.DRAM.local > 1139 ± 4% -46.1% 613.67 ± 5% perf-c2c.DRAM.remote > 1254 ± 5% -45.3% 686.50 ± 2% perf-c2c.HITM.local > 681.33 ± 3% -45.8% 369.50 ± 6% perf-c2c.HITM.remote > 1.33 ± 41% -93.8% 0.08 ±223% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_avg.min > 1.33 ± 41% -93.8% 0.08 ±223% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_avg.min > 10502 -34.4% 6886 sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg > 8094 ± 2% -41.8% 4710 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min > 21146 ± 2% -44.2% 11809 stress-ng.sync-file.ops > 352.20 ± 2% -44.2% 196.65 stress-ng.sync-file.ops_per_sec > 34.00 ± 2% -43.6% 19.17 stress-ng.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got > 20.20 ± 2% -43.6% 11.38 stress-ng.time.system_time > 513054 ± 2% -45.5% 279629 stress-ng.time.voluntary_context_switches > 28437 -10.3% 25522 proc-vmstat.nr_shmem > 25303 -1.0% 25040 proc-vmstat.nr_slab_reclaimable > 644388 -18.6% 524319 proc-vmstat.numa_hit > 578153 -20.8% 458095 proc-vmstat.numa_local > 682807 -18.2% 558809 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal > 675599 -18.3% 551960 ± 2% proc-vmstat.pgfree > 1.61 -5.0% 1.53 perf-stat.i.MPKI > 6.692e+08 ± 3% -8.2% 6.144e+08 ± 6% perf-stat.i.branch-instructions > 23.54 -2.2 21.29 perf-stat.i.cache-miss-rate% > 2665211 ± 3% -27.0% 1946091 ± 4% perf-stat.i.cache-misses > 12037045 ± 3% -18.2% 9840696 ± 3% perf-stat.i.cache-references > 18418 ± 3% -40.1% 11025 perf-stat.i.context-switches > 2.13 -5.4% 2.01 perf-stat.i.cpi > 3.964e+09 ± 3% -19.8% 3.177e+09 ± 4% perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles > 181.54 ± 3% -23.8% 138.31 ± 4% perf-stat.i.cpu-migrations > 1472 +7.4% 1581 perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses > 3.216e+09 ± 3% -7.6% 2.972e+09 ± 6% perf-stat.i.instructions > 0.65 +8.4% 0.71 ± 2% perf-stat.i.ipc > 0.83 -20.9% 0.66 ± 2% perf-stat.overall.MPKI > 4.24 +0.3 4.58 ± 2% perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate% > 22.13 -2.4 19.76 perf-stat.overall.cache-miss-rate% > 1.23 -13.1% 1.07 ± 2% perf-stat.overall.cpi > 1488 +9.8% 1634 perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses > 0.81 +15.1% 0.93 ± 2% perf-stat.overall.ipc > 6.587e+08 ± 3% -8.2% 6.047e+08 ± 6% perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions > 2623092 ± 3% -27.0% 1915109 ± 4% perf-stat.ps.cache-misses > 11851537 ± 3% -18.3% 9688099 ± 3% perf-stat.ps.cache-references > 18125 ± 3% -40.2% 10847 perf-stat.ps.context-switches > 3.903e+09 ± 3% -19.8% 3.129e+09 ± 4% perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles > 178.73 ± 3% -23.8% 136.12 ± 4% perf-stat.ps.cpu-migrations > 3.166e+09 ± 3% -7.6% 2.925e+09 ± 6% perf-stat.ps.instructions > 2.004e+11 -9.3% 1.818e+11 ± 5% perf-stat.total.instructions > 0.00 ±223% +4160.0% 0.04 ± 35% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.__mutex_lock.constprop.0.btrfs_create_pending_block_groups > 0.01 -100.0% 0.00 perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.btrfs_sync_log.btrfs_sync_file.do_fsync > 0.01 ± 15% +246.8% 0.03 ± 96% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.barrier_all_devices.write_all_supers.btrfs_sync_log > 0.00 ±223% +4180.0% 0.04 ± 35% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.__mutex_lock.constprop.0.btrfs_create_pending_block_groups > 0.02 ± 98% -100.0% 0.00 perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.btrfs_sync_log.btrfs_sync_file.do_fsync > 0.16 ±106% -77.8% 0.04 ± 39% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.wait_log_commit.btrfs_sync_log.btrfs_sync_file.do_fsync > 27.42 ± 3% +53.9% 42.21 ± 4% perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.average.ms > 40831 ± 3% -36.6% 25906 ± 4% perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.count.ms > 27.41 ± 3% +54.0% 42.21 ± 4% perf-sched.total_wait_time.average.ms > 229.23 ± 2% +51.7% 347.78 ± 15% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.irq_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork.ret_from_fork_asm > 12.64 ± 3% +56.9% 19.84 ± 3% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.rwsem_down_read_slowpath.down_read.btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested > 2.33 ± 11% +63.7% 3.81 ± 18% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.rwsem_down_write_slowpath.down_write.btrfs_tree_lock_nested > 6.94 ± 2% +29.6% 9.00 ± 11% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread > 0.31 ± 5% +421.7% 1.64 ± 25% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.wait_log_commit.btrfs_sync_log.btrfs_sync_file.do_fsync > 18.67 ± 5% -35.7% 12.00 ± 16% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.irq_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork.ret_from_fork_asm > 22342 ± 4% -40.1% 13375 ± 4% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.schedule_preempt_disabled.rwsem_down_read_slowpath.down_read.btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested > 9405 ± 4% -40.8% 5564 ± 4% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.schedule_preempt_disabled.rwsem_down_write_slowpath.down_write.btrfs_tree_lock_nested > 666.83 ± 2% -22.5% 516.50 ± 10% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread > 4582 ± 4% -37.4% 2866 ± 5% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.wait_log_commit.btrfs_sync_log.btrfs_sync_file.do_fsync > 5.34 ± 21% +756.6% 45.72 ± 4% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.io_schedule.bit_wait_io.__wait_on_bit.out_of_line_wait_on_bit > 22.83 ± 2% +15.9% 26.46 ± 8% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.io_schedule.folio_wait_bit_common.write_all_supers.btrfs_sync_log > 229.23 ± 2% +51.6% 347.59 ± 15% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.irq_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork.ret_from_fork_asm > 12.63 ± 3% +57.1% 19.83 ± 3% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.rwsem_down_read_slowpath.down_read.btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested > 2.32 ± 12% +64.0% 3.81 ± 18% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.rwsem_down_write_slowpath.down_write.btrfs_tree_lock_nested > 8.58 ± 9% -100.0% 0.00 perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.btrfs_sync_log.btrfs_sync_file.do_fsync > 6.94 ± 2% +29.6% 8.99 ± 11% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread > 0.31 ± 5% +427.4% 1.63 ± 25% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.wait_log_commit.btrfs_sync_log.btrfs_sync_file.do_fsync > 101.57 ± 20% +56.6% 159.06 ± 22% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.io_schedule.bit_wait_io.__wait_on_bit.out_of_line_wait_on_bit > 116.41 ± 27% -100.0% 0.00 perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_timeout.btrfs_sync_log.btrfs_sync_file.do_fsync > > > > > Disclaimer: > Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided > for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software > design or configuration may affect actual performance. > >