Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix L2 fails to boot due to VM entry with invalid control field

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

Am 15.02.2017 um 12:10 schrieb Wanpeng Li:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
> 
> When I run kvm-unit-tests/vmx.flat in L1, The L2 fails to boot due to VM 
> entry with invalid control field.
> 
> KVM: entry failed, hardware error 0x7
> EAX=00000000 EBX=00000000 ECX=00000000 EDX=000306c3
> ESI=00000000 EDI=00000000 EBP=00000000 ESP=00000000
> EIP=0000fff0 EFL=00000002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
> ES =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
> CS =f000 ffff0000 0000ffff 00009b00
> SS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
> DS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
> FS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
> GS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
> LDT=0000 00000000 0000ffff 00008200
> TR =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00008b00
> GDT=     00000000 0000ffff
> IDT=     00000000 0000ffff
> CR0=60000010 CR2=00000000 CR3=00000000 CR4=00000000
> DR0=0000000000000000 DR1=0000000000000000 DR2=0000000000000000 DR3=0000000000000000 
> DR6=00000000ffff0ff0 DR7=0000000000000400
> EFER=0000000000000000
> 
> nested_get_vmcs12_pages() fails to set VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR field in 
> vmcs02 even if acquires a virtual apic page. This patch fixes it by 
> setting VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR field in vmcs02 once acquires a virtual 
> apic page.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 204d6e6..650f3433 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -9685,7 +9685,7 @@ static void nested_get_vmcs12_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		 * control.  But such a configuration is useless, so
>  		 * let's keep the code simple.
>  		 */
> -		if (!vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page) {
> +		if (vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page) {
>  			hpa = page_to_phys(vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page);
>  			vmcs_write64(VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR, hpa);
>  		}
> 

On which branch is this?

-- 
Thanks,

David